Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/GeneralPunctuation.js

数学物理学报, 2020, 40(2): 328-339 doi:

论文

一阶格点系统的不变测度与Liouville型方程

李永军1, 桑燕苗2, 赵才地,2

Invariant Measures and Liouville Type Equation for First-Order Lattice System

Li Yongjun1, Sang Yanmiao2, Zhao Caidi,2

通讯作者: 赵才地, E-mail: zhaocaidi2013@163.com; zhaocaidi@wzu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2019-03-7  

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金.  11971356
国家自然科学基金.  11761044
浙江省自然科学基金.  LY17A010011
兰州城市学院重点建设项目.  LZCUZDJSXK-201706

Received: 2019-03-7  

Fund supported: the NSFC.  11971356
the NSFC.  11761044
the NSF of Zhejiang Province.  LY17A010011
the Key Constructive Discipline of Lanzhou City University.  LZCUZDJSXK-201706

摘要

该文讨论一阶格点系统的解在相空间中的概率分布问题.作者先证明该格点系统的解算子生成的过程存在拉回吸引子,然后证明拉回吸引子上存在唯一的Borel不变概率测度,且该不变测度满足Liouville型方程.

关键词: 格点系统 ; 拉回吸引子 ; 不变测度 ; Liouville型方程

Abstract

This article discusses the probability distribution of solutions in the phase space for the first-order lattice system. The authors first prove the the process generated by the solutions operator of the lattice system possesses a pullback attractor. Then they prove that there is a unique family of invariant probability measures contained in pullback attractor and the measures satisfy a Liouville type equation.

Keywords: Lattice system ; Pullback attractor ; Invariant measure ; Liouville type equation

PDF (389KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

李永军, 桑燕苗, 赵才地. 一阶格点系统的不变测度与Liouville型方程. 数学物理学报[J], 2020, 40(2): 328-339 doi:

Li Yongjun, Sang Yanmiao, Zhao Caidi. Invariant Measures and Liouville Type Equation for First-Order Lattice System. Acta Mathematica Scientia[J], 2020, 40(2): 328-339 doi:

1 引言

本文讨论下面的一阶格点系统

˙um=ν(um12um+um+1)λumf(um)+gm(t),mZ,t>τ,
(1.1)

um(τ)=uτ,m,mZ,
(1.2)

其中Z={,m,,2,1,0,1,2,,m,}表示整数集, ν,λ是正的常数, um(t)是未知函数, gm(t)f()是给定的函数.文中将假设g(t)=(gm(t))mZC(R;2) (所有定义在R上取值于2中的连续函数全体)且(uτ,m)mZ2,这里

2={u=(um)mZ|mZu2m<+}.

方程(1.1)可以看作是下面反应扩散方程在R (实数轴)上的空间离散化近似

ut=ν2ux2λuf(u)+g(t).
(1.3)

已有一些文献研究了方程(1.3)的解的渐近行为.例如文献[1]研究了有界区域上全局吸引子的存在性,文献[2-4]研究了无界区域上全局吸引子与指数吸引子的存在性,文献[5]研究了该方程的动力学分叉问题.特别地,文献[6]证明了方程(1.3)的离散近似方程,也即方程(1.1)在自治情形全局吸引子的存在性与上半连续性.

格点系统是某些变量离散化的时空系统,包括耦合的常微分方程组、耦合映射格点和细胞自动机[7].在某些情况下,格点系统表现为偏微分方程的空间变量离散化近似.格点动力系统在现实中有很多应用,如:涉及生物学[8],化学反应理论[9],激光理论[10],材料科学[11],图象处理与模式识别[12],等等.

迄今关于格点动力系统的动力学的研究已有很多工作.例如文献[13-14]研究了一阶和二阶耗散格点动力系统整体吸引子的存在性和上半连续性;文献[15-18]研究了非自治格点动力系统存在紧致核截面与一致吸引子的充要条件,以及核截面与一致吸引子的上半连续性和熵的估计,并将理论应用于具体的格点数学物理方程;文献[19]研究了一阶时滞格点系统吸引子的存在性;文献[20-22]研究了随机格点动力系统的随机吸引子;文献[23-25]讨论了格点动力系统指数吸引子与一致指数吸引子的存在性问题.值得指出的是,文献[26]证明了一般非自治格点系统存在拉回吸引子的充要条件,并研究了格点Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger方程组不变测度的存在性.

本文的初衷是研究一般一阶格点系统(1.1)的不变测度的存在性.不变测度的研究来源于统计物理,对于人们理解湍流的运动规律很有帮助[27],其主要原因是湍流的几个主要物理量(如速度,动能)关于时间平均后表现出很强的规律.如今已有若干文献研究了耗散系统的不变测度和统计解,例如文献[28]研究了耗散系统稳态统计解的上半连续性;文献[29]应用广义Banach极限构造了一般度量空间上的连续动力系统的不变测度;后来,文献[30]改进了文献[28-29]的结果,给出了一类广泛的耗散半群的不变测度和统计解的构造方法.最近,文献[31]把文献[30]的结果推广到非自治耗散系统,证明了完备的度量空间X中的连续过程{U(t,τ)}tτ存在不变Borel概率测度的充分条件是: (ⅰ)过程{U(t,τ)}tτX中存在拉回吸引子; (ⅱ)对每个xX及每个tR, X -值函数τU(t,τ)x(,t]上连续且有界.该结果已被应用到全局修正的三维Navier-Stokes方程组[32], Ladyzhenskaya流体力学方程组[33],正则化MHD方程组[34]和格点Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger方程组[26].另外,文献[35]研究了三维全局修正的Navier-Stokes方程组不变测度与轨道统计解的存在性和渐近正则性.

证得了拉回吸引子上不变测度的存在性之后,本文的第二个目的是证明该不变测度满足Liouville型方程. Liouville方程及其相应的Liouville定理是统计物理中的重要结果.粗略地讲,它是指在哈密顿动力学演化下的点集在相空间中的分布可以随时间演化而变形,但该点集的测度(或相体积)是守恒的(见文献[36, p113]).本文将证明一阶格点系统(1.1)的不变测度也满足Liouville型方程和Liouville定理的结论.

2 解的存在唯一性与拉回吸引子

为把问题(1.1)–(1.2)写成一阶常微分方程的初值问题,我们在空间2上赋以以下内积和范数

(u,v)=mZumvm,

\big(\ell^2, (\cdot, \cdot)\big) 是Hilbert空间.在 \ell^2 上定义算子 A, B, B^* 如下

\begin{eqnarray*} (Au)_m & = &2u_m-u_{m-1}-u_{m+1}, \, \forall\, u = (u_m)_{m\in {\Bbb Z}}\in \ell^2, \\ (Bu)_m & = &u_{m+1}-u_{m-1}, \, \forall\, u = (u_m)_{m\in {\Bbb Z}}\in \ell^2, \\ (B^*u)_m & = &u_{m-1}-u_{m+1}, \, \forall\, u = (u_m)_{m\in {\Bbb Z}}\in \ell^2. \end{eqnarray*}

简单计算可得

(Au, v) = (B^*Bu, v) = (Bu, Bv), \, \forall\, u = (u_m)_{m\in {\Bbb Z}}, v = (v_m)_{m\in {\Bbb Z}}\in \ell^2,

\|Au\|^2 \leqslant 16\|u\|^2, \|Bu\|^2\leqslant 4\|u\|^2, \, \forall\, u = (u_m)_{m\in {\Bbb Z}}\in \ell^2.

我们记 f(u) = (f(u_m))_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} ,则求解的初值问题(1.1)–(1.2)可以写成Hilbert空间 \ell^2 中的初值问题

\begin{eqnarray} && \frac{{\mathrm d} u}{{\mathrm d}t} +\nu Au+\lambda u+f(u) = g(t), \, t>\tau, \end{eqnarray}
(2.1)

\begin{eqnarray} && u(\tau) = u_\tau = (u_{\tau, m})_{m\in {\mathbb Z}}\in \ell^2. \end{eqnarray}
(2.2)

为保证以上初值问题解的存在唯一性和有界性,我们假设函数 f(s) g(t) = (g_m(t))_{m\in{\mathbb Z}} 满足下面条件

\begin{eqnarray} {\rm (H)}: \quad \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} f(s)\in {\mathcal C}^1({\mathbb R}), \mbox {且}\ f(s)s\geqslant 0, & \forall\, s\in {\mathbb R}; \\ g(t) = (g_m(t))_{m\in{\mathbb Z}}\in {\mathcal C}(\ell^2), \mbox {且}\ \int_{-\infty}^t e^{\lambda s}\|g(s)\|^2{\mathrm d}s<+\infty, & \forall\, t\in {\mathbb R}. \end{array} \right. \end{eqnarray}
(2.3)

引理2.1  设条件 {\rm (H)}成立.

(1)对每个 u_\tau\in \ell^2 ,初值问题(2.1)–(2.2)存在唯一的局部解

\begin{eqnarray} u\in {\mathcal C}([\tau, T_*); \ell^2)\cap {\mathcal C}^1((\tau, T_*); \ell^2), \end{eqnarray}
(2.4)

其中 T_* > \tau ,并且如果 T_* < +\infty ,则有 \lim\limits_{t\rightarrow T_*^-}\|u(t)\| = +\infty .

(2)上述对应于 u_\tau 的解 u 满足

\begin{eqnarray} \|u(t)\|^2 \leqslant \|u_\tau\|^2e^{-\lambda(t-\tau)} +\frac{e^{-\lambda t}}{\lambda}\int_\tau^te^{\lambda s}\|g(s)\|^2{\mathrm d}s, \, \forall\, t\geqslant \tau. \end{eqnarray}
(2.5)

   (1)注意到 u\rightarrow Au u\rightarrow \lambda u 都是 \ell^2 上的有界线性算子,而 g(t)\in {\mathcal C}(\ell^2) ,我们只需证明 f(u) \ell^2 上的局部Lipschitz映射.事实上,设 {\mathcal B} \ell^2 中的有界闭球,任取 u, v\in \ell^2 ,由微分中值定理得

\begin{eqnarray} \|f(u)-f(v)\|^2 = \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}}|f(u_m)-f(v_m)|^2 = \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}}|f'(\xi_m)||u_m-v_m|^2, \end{eqnarray}
(2.6)

其中 \xi_m = u_m+\vartheta_m(v_m-u_m)\in {\mathcal B} , \vartheta_m\in (0, 1) .因为 f\in {\mathcal C}^1({\mathbb R}) , (2.6)式表明

\begin{eqnarray*} \|f(u)-f(v)\|^2 \leqslant L({\mathcal B})\|u-v\|^2, \end{eqnarray*}

其中 L({\mathcal B}) = \max\limits_{\xi\in {\mathcal B}}|f'(\xi)| .由经典的常微分方程理论, (1)得证.

(2)用 u 与方程(2.1)作内积得

\frac12\frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t}\|u(t)\|^2 +\nu \|Bu(t)\|^2 +\lambda\|u(t)\|^2 = -(f(u(t)), u(t))+(g(t), u(t)).

因为

-(f(u(t)), u(t)) = -\sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}}f(u_m(t))u_m(t)\leqslant 0,

(g(t), u(t))\leqslant \frac{\lambda \|u(t)\|^2}{2}+\frac{\|g(t)\|^2}{2\lambda},

所以

\frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t}\|u(t)\|^2 +\lambda\|u(t)\|^2 \leqslant \frac{\|g(t)\|^2}{\lambda}.

由上式和Gronwall不等式即得(2.5)式.证明完毕.

引理2.1表明若条件(H)成立,则对每个 u_\tau\in \ell^2 问题(2.1)–(2.2)相应的解 u(\cdot) [0, +\infty) 上全局存在,且

\begin{eqnarray} u(\cdot) \in {\mathcal C}([\tau, +\infty); \ell^2) \cap {\mathcal C}^1((\tau, +\infty); \ell^2). \end{eqnarray}
(2.7)

从而问题(2.1)–(2.2)的解算子

U(t, \tau): u_\tau\in \ell^2 \longmapsto u(t) = u(t; \tau, u_\tau) = U(t, \tau)u_\tau\in \ell^2, \, \forall\, t\geqslant\tau,

\ell^2 上生成连续过程 \{U(t, \tau)\}_{t\geqslant\tau} ,其中 u(t) = u(t; \tau, u_\tau) 表示问题(2.1)–(2.2)以 \tau 时刻 u_\tau 为初值的解.

\begin{eqnarray} {\mathcal D}_\lambda = \Big\{ {\widehat D} = \{D(s)|s\in {\mathbb R}\} \mid \lim\limits_{s\rightarrow-\infty} e^{\lambda s}\sup\limits_{u\in D(S)}\|u\|^2 = 0 \Big\}. \end{eqnarray}
(2.8)

显然, \ell^2 中任何与时间无关的有界集都属于 {\mathcal D}_\lambda .

引理2.2  设条件{\rm (H)} 成立,则存在 \widehat{{\mathcal B}}_0 = \{{\mathcal B}_0(s)|s\in {\mathbb R}\} 使得对任意 {\widehat D} = \{D(s)|s\in {\mathbb R}\}\in {\mathcal D}_\lambda , \exists \tau_0 = \tau_0(t, \widehat{D})\leqslant t U(t, \tau)D(\tau)\subset {\mathcal B}_0(t) , \forall\, \tau\leqslant \tau_0 ,其中 {\mathcal B}_0(s) = {\mathcal B}_0(0; R_\lambda(s)) \ell^2 中以原点为球心以 R_\lambda(s) 为半径的球.

  记

R^2_\lambda(s) = 1+\frac{e^{-\lambda t}}{\lambda}\int_{-\infty}^te^{\lambda s}\|g(s)\|^2{\mathrm d}s, \, s\in {\mathbb R},

则由(2.5)式知结论成立.

由条件(H)知,对每个给定的时间 t ,引理2.2中的球 {\mathcal B}_0(0; R_\lambda(s)) 都是 \ell^2 中有界集.集合 \widehat{{\mathcal B}}_0 = \{{\mathcal B}_0(0; R_\lambda(s))|s\in {\mathbb R}\} 称为过程 \{U(t, \tau)\}_{t\geqslant\tau} 的有界拉回 {\mathcal D}_\lambda -吸收集.为得到拉回 {\mathcal D}_\lambda -吸引子的存在性,我们下面证明过程 \{U(t, \tau)\}_{t\geqslant\tau} 具有拉回 {\mathcal D}_\lambda 渐近零的性质.

引理2.3  设条件 {\rm (H)} 成立.则对于给定的 t\in {\mathbb R} , \forall\, \epsilon>0 \forall\, {\widehat D} = \{D(s)|s\in {\mathbb R}\}\in {\mathcal D}_\lambda , \exists M_* = M_*(t, \epsilon, {\widehat D})\in {\mathbb N} \tau_* = \tau_*(t, \epsilon, {\widehat D})\leqslant t ,使得

\begin{eqnarray} \sup\limits_{u_\tau\in D(\tau)} \sum\limits_{|m|\geqslant M_*}|(U(t, \tau)u_\tau)_m|^2 \leqslant \epsilon^2, \quad\forall\, \tau\leqslant \tau_*. \end{eqnarray}
(2.9)

  选取适当光滑函数 \chi(x)\in {\mathcal C}^1({\mathbb R}_+, {\mathbb R}_+) 使得

\begin{eqnarray} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \chi(x) = 0, & 0\leqslant x\leqslant 1, \\ 0\leqslant \chi(x)\leqslant 1, & 1\leqslant x\leqslant 2, \\ \chi(x) = 1, & x\geqslant 2, \\ |\chi'(x)|\leqslant \chi_0 (\mbox{正数}), & x\geqslant 0. \end{array} \right. \end{eqnarray}
(2.10)

考虑任意的 {\widehat D} = \{D(s)|s\in {\mathbb R}\}\in {\mathcal D}_\lambda ,对任意 t, \tau\in {\mathbb R} , t\geqslant \tau ,记 u(t) = u(t; \tau, u_\tau) = U(t, \tau)u_\tau 为问题(2.1)–(2.2)的以 u_\tau\in D(\tau) 为初值的解.设 M 为某正的常数,记 v_m = \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u_m , m\in {\mathbb Z} . v = (v_m)_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} 与方程(2.1)作内积,得

\begin{eqnarray} (\dot{u}(t), v(t))+\nu(Au(t), v(t))+\lambda(u(t), v(t))+(f(u(t)), v(t)) = (g(t), v(t)). \end{eqnarray}
(2.11)

经过计算和估计,有

\begin{equation} (\dot{u}(t), v(t)) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t} \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(t), \end{equation}
(2.12)

\begin{eqnarray} (Au(t), v(t)) & = &(Bu(t), Bv(t)) = \sum\limits_{m\in{\mathbb Z}} (u_{m+1}-u_{m-1}) \big(\chi(\frac{|m+1|}{M})u_{m+1}-\chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u_{m}\big)\\ & = & \sum\limits_{m\in{\mathbb Z}}\chi(\frac{|m+1|}{M})(u_{m+1}-u_{m})^2 +\sum\limits_{m\in{\mathbb Z}} \chi'(\frac{|\tilde{m}|}{M})\frac{u_m(u_{m+1}-u_{m})}{M}, \end{eqnarray}
(2.13)

\begin{equation} (f(u(t)), v(t)) = \sum\limits_{m\in{\mathbb Z}}\chi(\frac{|m|}{M}) f(u_m)u_m\geqslant 0, \end{equation}
(2.14)

\begin{equation} (g(t), v(t)) = \sum\limits_{m\in{\mathbb Z}}\chi(\frac{|m|}{M})g_m(t)u_m \leqslant \frac{1}{2\lambda}\sum\limits_{m\in{\mathbb Z}}\chi(\frac{|m|}{M})g^2_m(t) +\frac{\lambda}{2}\sum\limits_{m\in{\mathbb Z}}\chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m, \end{equation}
(2.15)

其中(2.13)式中的 |\tilde{m}| 是介于 |m| |m+1| 中的常数.把(2.12)–(2.15)式代入(2.11)式,再应用(2.10)式和拉回吸引性,得到

\begin{equation} \frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t} \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(t) + \lambda\sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(t) \leqslant \frac{1}{\lambda}\sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})g^2_m(t) +\frac{4\chi_0R^2_{\lambda}(t)}{M}, \, \tau\leqslant\tau_0. \end{equation}
(2.16)

现对任意的 \epsilon > 0 ,存在 M_1 = M_1(t, \epsilon)\in {\mathbb N} ,使得

\begin{equation} \frac{4\chi_0R^2_{\lambda}(t)}{M} \leqslant \frac{\lambda \epsilon^2}{3}, \, \forall\, M>M_1. \end{equation}
(2.17)

把(2.17)式代入(2.16)式有

\frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t} \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(t) + \lambda\sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(t) \leqslant \frac{1}{\lambda}\sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})g^2_m(t) +\frac{\lambda \epsilon^2}{3}, \, \tau\leqslant\tau_0, \, M>M_1.

对上式应用Gronwall不等式,得

\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(t) \leqslant \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(\tau)e^{-\lambda(t-\tau)} +\frac{e^{-\lambda t}}{\lambda}\int_\tau^t e^{\lambda\theta}\sum\limits_{|m|\geqslant M}g^2_m(\theta){\mathrm d}\theta +\frac{\epsilon^2}{3}. \end{equation}
(2.18)

由(2.3)式知对上述 \epsilon > 0 ,存在 M_2 = M_2(t, \epsilon)\in {\mathbb N} ,使得

\begin{eqnarray} \int_\tau^te^{\lambda\theta}\sum\limits_{|m|\geqslant M}g^2_m(\theta){\mathrm d}\theta \leqslant \sum\limits_{|m|\geqslant M}\int_{-\infty}^te^{\lambda\theta}g^2_m(\theta){\mathrm d}\theta \leqslant \frac{\epsilon^2}{3}, \, M\geqslant M_2. \end{eqnarray}
(2.19)

再由(2.8)式知对上述 \epsilon > 0 ,存在 \tau_1 = \tau_1(t, \epsilon, {\hat D}) 使得

\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}} \chi(\frac{|m|}{M})u^2_m(\tau)e^{-\lambda(t-\tau)} \leqslant e^{-\lambda(t-\tau)}\|u_\tau\|^2 \leqslant e^{-\lambda(t-\tau)}\sup\limits_{u_\tau\in D(\tau)}\|u_\tau\|^2 < \frac{\epsilon^2}{3}, \, \tau\leqslant\tau_1. \end{equation}
(2.20)

从(2.18)–(2.20)式即推得(2.9)式.证明完毕.

应用文献[26,定理2.1]和上面证得的引理2.2、引理2.3,我们得到本节的主要结果如下.

定理2.1  假设条件 {\rm (H)} 成立.则系统(1.1)–(1.2)的解算子生成的过程 \{U(t, \tau)\}_{t\geqslant \tau} \ell^2 中存在拉回 {\mathcal D}_\lambda -吸引子 \widehat{{\mathcal A}}_{{\mathcal D}_\lambda} = \{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_\lambda}| t\in {\mathbb R}\} ,满足

(1)紧性: \forall\, t\in {\mathbb R} , {\mathcal {A}}_{\mathcal {D_{\lambda}}}(t) \ell^2 的非空紧子集;

(2)不变性: U(t, \tau){\mathcal {A}}_{{\cal D_{\lambda}}}(\tau) = {\mathcal {A}}_{\mathcal {D_{\lambda}}}(t), \, \forall\, t\geqslant \tau ;

(3)拉回吸引性: \forall \widehat{D_{\lambda}} = \{ D_{\lambda}(t)| t\in {\mathbb R}\} \in {\mathcal {D_{\lambda}}} ,有

\; \lim\limits_{\tau\rightarrow -\infty}{\rm dist}_{\ell^2} \big(U(t, \tau)D_{\lambda}(\tau), {\mathcal {A}}_{\mathcal {D_{\lambda}}}(t) \big) = 0, t\in{\mathbb R}.

3 不变测度与Liouville型方程

本节我们先证明过程 \{U(t, \tau)\}_{t\geqslant \tau} 具有 \tau -连续性(指对任意固定的 t\in {\mathbb R} 和给定的 u_*\in \ell^2 , \ell^2 -值函数 \tau\longmapsto U(t, \tau)u_* (-\infty, t] 上连续且有界),进而得到拉回 {\mathcal D}_\lambda -吸引子 \widehat{{\mathcal A}}_{{\mathcal D}_\lambda} = \{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_\lambda}| t\in {\mathbb R}\} 上不变Borel概率测度的存在性.然后我们证明得到的不变测度满足Liouville型方程.

先介绍广义Banach极限的概念.

定义3.1[27]  记 \Lambda 为定义在 [0, +\infty) 上的有界实值函数全体. \Lambda 上的任意一个线性泛函(记作) {\rm LIM}_{s\rightarrow +\infty} 若满足:

(ⅰ)对任何 h\in \Lambda ,有 {\rm LIM}_{s\rightarrow +\infty}h(s)\geqslant 0 ;

(ⅱ)如果通常意义下的极限 \lim\limits_{s\rightarrow +\infty}h(s) 存在,则LIM _{s\rightarrow +\infty}h(s) = \lim\limits_{s\rightarrow +\infty}h(s) ,

则称 {\rm LIM}_{s\rightarrow +\infty} 为广义Banach极限.

注3.1  我们讨论"拉回"吸引子时需要考虑初始时间 \tau\rightarrow-\infty .为此,对于给定的定义在 (-\infty, 0] 上的实值函数 \varphi 和给定的广义Banach极限 {\rm LIM}_{s\rightarrow +\infty} ,我们定义

{\rm LIM}_{s\rightarrow-\infty}\varphi(s) = \lim\limits_{s\rightarrow +\infty}\varphi(-s).

同时,广义Banach极限有下面的性质(见文献[27, (1.38)式]或[30, (2.3)式])

\begin{eqnarray} |{\rm LIM}_{s\rightarrow +\infty}h(t)| \leqslant \limsup\limits_{s\rightarrow +\infty}|h(t)|, \forall\, h(\cdot)\in\Lambda. \end{eqnarray}
(3.1)

引理3.1  设条件 {\rm (H)} 成立.则对任意给定的 t\in {\mathbb R} u_*\in \ell^2 , \ell^2 -值函数 \tau\longmapsto U(t, \tau)u_* (-\infty, t] 上连续且有界.

  考虑给定的 u_*\in \ell^2 t\in {\mathbb R} .由(2.5)式得

\begin{eqnarray} \|u(s)\|^2 &\leqslant& \|u_*\|^2e^{-\lambda(s-\tau)} +\frac{e^{-\lambda s}}{\lambda}\int_\tau^s e^{\lambda \theta}\|g(\theta)\|^2{\mathrm d}\theta \\ &\leqslant& \|u_*\|^2 +\frac{e^{-\lambda t}}{\lambda}\int_\tau^t e^{\lambda \theta}\|g(\theta)\|^2{\mathrm d}\theta\\ &\leqslant& \|u_*\|^2 +\frac{e^{-\lambda t}}{\lambda}\int_{-\infty}^t e^{\lambda \theta}\|g(\theta)\|^2{\mathrm d}\theta, \, \forall\, t\geqslant s\geqslant \tau. \end{eqnarray}
(3.2)

由条件(H)知(3.2)式的右端的上界与 s\in (-\infty, t] 无关.因此, U(t, \cdot)u_* (-\infty, t] 上有界.

任取 s_*\in (-\infty, t] ,我们下面证明 U(t, \tau)u_* \tau = s_* 处连续.为此,我们需要证明 \forall\, \epsilon > 0 , \exists \delta = \delta(\epsilon, s_*, t, u_*) > 0 ,使得 |r-s_*| < \delta 时就有 \|U(t, s_*)u_*-U(t, r)u_*\| < \epsilon .不妨设 r < s_* < t .

U(\cdot, s_*)U(s_*, r)u_* = u^{(1)}(\cdot), \quad U(\cdot, s_*)U(r, r)u_* = u^{(2)}(\cdot), \quad \tilde{u}(\cdot) = u^{(1)}(\cdot)-u^{(2)}(\cdot).

\tilde{u}(\cdot) 满足下面的初值问题

\begin{equation} \frac{{\mathrm d}\tilde{u}}{{\mathrm d}t} +\nu A\tilde{u} +\lambda \tilde{u} +f(u^{(1)})-f(u^{(2)}) = 0, \, t>s_*, \end{equation}
(3.3)

\begin{equation} \tilde{u}(s_*) = U(s_*, r)u_*-U(r, r)u_*. \end{equation}
(3.4)

\tilde{u} 与(3.3)式作内积得

\begin{eqnarray} \frac12\frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t}\|\tilde{u}(t)\|^2 +\nu \|B\tilde{u}(t)\|^2 +\lambda\|\tilde{u}(t)\|^2 +\sum\limits_{m\in {\mathbb Z}}(f(u_{m}^{(1)})-f(u_{m}^{(2)}))\tilde{u}_m = 0. \end{eqnarray}
(3.5)

而由微分中值定理知存在常数 \vartheta_m\in (0, 1) ,使得

f(u_{m}^{(1)})-f(u_{m}^{(2)}) = f'(u_{m}^{(1)}+\vartheta_m(u_{m}^{(1)}-u_{m}^{(2)}))\tilde{u}_m, \, m\in {\Bbb Z}.

对任意 m\in {\Bbb Z} ,由(3.2)式知

|u_{m}^{(1)}+\vartheta_m(u_{m}^{(1)}-u_{m}^{(2)})| \leqslant 2\|u^{(1)}\|+\|u^{(2)}\| \leqslant 3(\|u_*\|^2 +\frac{e^{-\lambda t}}{\lambda}\int_{-\infty}^t e^{\lambda \theta}\|g(\theta)\|^2{\mathrm d}\theta).

L = L(u_*, t) = 3(\|u_*\|^2+\frac{e^{-\lambda t}}{\lambda}\int_{-\infty}^t e^{\lambda \theta}\|g(\theta)\|^2{\mathrm d}\theta), \quad {\mathcal M} = {\mathcal M}(u_*, t) = 2\max\limits_{\eta\in [0, L]}|f'(\eta)|,

则由(3.5)式得

\frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t}\|\tilde{u}(t)\|^2 \leqslant {\mathcal M}(u_*, t)\|\tilde{u}(t)\|^2.

对上式用Gronwall不等式且注意到 {\mathcal M}(u_*, t) 关于 t 的单调递增性,得

\|\tilde{u}(t)\|^2 \leqslant \|\tilde{u}(s_*)\|^2\exp\bigg\{\int_{s_*}^t{\mathcal M}(u_*, \theta){\mathrm d}\theta\bigg\} \leqslant \|\tilde{u}(s_*)\|^2\exp\{(t-s_*){\mathcal M}(u_*, t)\},

也即是

\|U(t, s_*)u_*-U(t, r)u_*\|^2 \leqslant \|U(s_*, r)u_*-U(r, r)u_*\|^2\exp\{(t-s_*){\mathcal M}(u_*, t)\}.

由(2.7)式知当 |r-s_*| 足够小时,上不等式右端的 \|U(s_*, r)u_*-U(r, r)u_*\|^2 就能充分地小.证明完毕.

结合文献[31,定理3.1、定理4.1]和本文证得的定理2.1和引理3.1,我们得到下面结果.

定理3.1  设条件 {\rm (H)} 成立. {\rm LIM}_{s\rightarrow +\infty} 是给定的广义 {\rm Banach }极限, \psi(\cdot): {\mathbb R}\longmapsto \ell^2 是连续映射且 \psi(\cdot)\in {\mathcal D}_{\lambda} .则存在 \ell^2 上一族Borel概率测度 \{\mu_t\}_{t\in {\mathbb R}} , \mu_t 的支集包含于 {\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t) 中,并有

\begin{eqnarray} {\rm LIM}_{\tau\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{t-\tau}\int_\tau^t\Phi(U(t, s)\psi(s)){\mathrm d}s = \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)} \Phi(u){\mathrm d}\mu_t(u) = \int_{\ell^2} \Phi(u){\mathrm d}\mu_t(u), \end{eqnarray}
(3.6)

其中 \Phi \ell^2 上连续有界实值函数.同时, \mu_t 满足如下不变性质和平均性质

\begin{equation} \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_\lambda}(t)} \Phi(u){\mathrm d}\mu_t(u) = \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_\lambda}(\tau)} \Phi(U(t, \tau)u){\mathrm d}\mu_\tau(u), \quad t\geqslant \tau. \end{equation}
(3.7)

\begin{equation} {\rm LIM}_{\tau\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{t-\tau}\int_\tau^t\int_{\ell^2} \Phi(U(t, s)u){\mathrm d}\mu_s(u){\mathrm d}s = \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)} \Phi(u){\mathrm d}\mu_t(u). \end{equation}
(3.8)

下面证明定理3.1中的不变Borel测度 \{\mu_t\}_{t\in {\mathbb R}} 满足Liouville型方程.我们先把方程(2.1)写成下面形式

\begin{eqnarray} \frac{{\mathrm d}u}{{\mathrm d}t} = F(u, t) = -\nu A u-\lambda u-f(u)+g(t), \quad t>\tau. \end{eqnarray}
(3.9)

\Phi 是定义在 \ell^2 上的实值函数,在 \ell^2 的有界子集上有界,且满足

(1)对任意 u\in \ell^2 , \Phi(u) 的Frechét导数(记作 \Phi'(u) )存在,也即对每个 u\in \ell^2 ,存在 \ell^2 中元素 \Phi'(u) ,使得

\lim\limits_{\|v\|\rightarrow 0} \frac{|\Phi(u+v)-\Phi(u)-(\Phi'(u), v)|}{\|v\|} = 0, \quad v\in \ell^2.

(2)映射 u\longmapsto \Phi'(u) 是从 \ell^2 \ell^2 的连续有界函数.

我们把满足上述条件(1)–(2)的全体函数的集合记作 {\cal T} (称为试验函数类),并称 {\cal T} 中的函数为试验函数.上述条件(1)–(2)保证了方程(3.9)的解满足下面的等式

\begin{eqnarray} \frac{{\mathrm d}}{{\mathrm d}t}\Phi(u) = (\Phi'(u), F(u, t)). \end{eqnarray}
(3.10)

对于一般Banach空间中的试验函数类的定义和常见选取方法可以参考文献[27, p178,定义1.2].

定理3.2  设条件 {\rm (H)} 成立.则对任意的 \Phi\in {\mathcal T} ,测度 \{\mu_t\}_{t\in {\mathbb R}} 满足下面的{\rm Liouville }型方程

\begin{equation} \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)}\Phi(u){\mathrm d}\mu_t(u) - \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(\tau)}\Phi(u){\mathrm d}\mu_\tau(u) = \int_\tau^t \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(\eta)} (\Phi'(u), F(u, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_\eta(u){\mathrm d}\eta, \, \forall\, t\geqslant \tau. \end{equation}
(3.11)

  为简洁起见,我们取 \Phi(u) = \|u\|^2 进行证明,对于一般的试验函数 \Phi\in {\mathcal T} ,证明完全类似.

u 是方程(3.9)的解.由于 \Phi(u) = \|u\|^2 ,经简单计算得 \Phi'(u) = 2u . u 与方程(3.9)作内积,然后在 [\tau, t] 上积分,得

\begin{eqnarray} \|u(t)\|^2-\|u(\tau)\|^2 = \int_\tau^t(2u(\theta), F(u(\theta), \theta)){\mathrm d}\theta. \end{eqnarray}
(3.12)

对任意 s < \tau ,设 u_0\in\ell^2 且记 u(\eta) = U(\eta, s)u_0 , \eta\geqslant s .由(3.12)式得

\begin{eqnarray} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2-\|U(\tau, s)u_0\|^2 = \int_\tau^t(2U(\eta, s)u_0, F(U(\eta, s)u_0, \eta)){\mathrm d}\eta. \end{eqnarray}
(3.13)

因为测度 \{\mu_t\}_{t\in {\mathbb R}} 满足(3.8)式,所以

\begin{eqnarray} && \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)} \|u\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_t(u) - \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(\tau)} \|u\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_\tau(u) \\ & = & {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{t-M}\int_M^t\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s \\ && - {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-M}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2} \|U(\tau, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s\\ & = & {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-(M-t+\tau)}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s \\ && +{\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{t-M}\int_\tau^t\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s \\ && - {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-M}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2} \|U(\tau, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s. \end{eqnarray}
(3.14)

由(3.6)和(3.7)式知积分

\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0) = \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(s)} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0) = \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)} \|u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_t(u_0)

s 无关.同时,对每个 t\in {\mathbb R} , {\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t) \ell^2 中紧集.由(2.3)和(2.5)式推得

\begin{eqnarray*} \int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0) = \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)} \|u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_t(u_0) <+\infty. \end{eqnarray*}

因此

\begin{eqnarray} && {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{t-M}\int_\tau^t\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s \\ & = & \lim\limits_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{t-M}\int_\tau^t\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s = 0. \end{eqnarray}
(3.15)

同时,经过简单变换和计算我们也有

\begin{eqnarray} && {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-(M-t+\tau)}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s\\ & = & {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-M}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2} \|U(t, s)u_0\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s. \end{eqnarray}
(3.16)

结合(3.13)–(3.16)式并应用Fubini定理,就有

\begin{eqnarray} & & \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)} \|u\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_t(u) - \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(\tau)} \|u\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_\tau(u) \\ & = & {\rm LIM}_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-M}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2} (\|U(t, s)u_0\|^2-\|U(\tau, s)u_0\|^2){\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s \\ & = & \lim\limits_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-M}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2} (\|U(t, s)u_0\|^2-\|U(\tau, s)u_0\|^2){\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s \\ & = & \lim\limits_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-M}\int_M^\tau\int_{\ell^2}\int_\tau^t (2U(\eta, s)u_0, F(U(\eta, s)u_0, \eta)) {\mathrm d}\eta{\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}s\\ & = & \lim\limits_{M\rightarrow-\infty} \frac{1}{\tau-M}\int_M^\tau\int_\tau^t\int_{\ell^2} (2U(\eta, s)u_0, F(U(\eta, s)u_0, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0){\mathrm d}\eta{\mathrm d}s. \end{eqnarray}
(3.17)

再由 \{\mu_t\}_{t\in {\mathbb R}} 的不变性(见(3.7)式)得

\begin{eqnarray} && \int_{\ell^2}(2U(\eta, s)u_0, F(U(\eta, s)u_0, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0) \\ & = & \int_{\ell^2} (2U(\eta, \theta)U(\theta, s)u_0, F(U(\eta, \theta)U(\theta, s)u_0, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_s(u_0) \\ & = & \int_{\ell^2}(2U(\eta, \theta)u_0, F(U(\eta, \theta)u_0, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_\theta(u_0). \end{eqnarray}
(3.18)

(3.18)式的右端与 s 无关.因此,由 \{\mu_t\}_{t\in {\mathbb R}} 的不变性,且注意到 \mu_\eta 的支集包含于 {\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_\lambda}(\eta) 中,得

\begin{eqnarray*} && \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)}\|u\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_t(u) - \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(\tau)}\|u\|^2{\mathrm d}\mu_\tau(u) \nonumber\\ & = & \int_\tau^t\int_{\ell^2} (2U(\eta, \theta)u_0, F(U(\eta, \theta)u_0, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_\theta(u_0)\nonumber\\ & = & \int_\tau^t \int_{\ell^2} (2u, F(u, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_\eta(u){\mathrm d}\eta \nonumber\\ & = & \int_\tau^t \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(\eta)} (2u, F(u, \eta)){\mathrm d}\mu_\eta(u){\mathrm d}\eta, \, \forall\, t\geqslant \tau. \end{eqnarray*}

证明完毕.

据定理3.2,我们易得下面推论.

推论3.1  设条件 {\rm (H)} 成立,且 \Phi\in {\mathcal T} 满足 \Phi'(u) = 0 , u\in \ell^2 .则有

\begin{eqnarray} \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(t)}\Phi(u){\mathrm d}\mu_t(u) = \int_{{\mathcal A}_{{\mathcal D}_{\lambda}}(\tau)} \Phi(u) {\mathrm d}\mu_\tau(u), \, \forall\, t\geqslant \tau. \end{eqnarray}
(3.19)

在统计物理中,满足 \Phi'(u) = 0 ( u\in \ell^2 ) \Phi\in {\mathcal T} 称为系统的统计平衡点(见文献[27, p177]),它意味着系统的统计信息不再随时间演化而变化,此时, (3.19)式也可直接由(3.7)式推得,它表明系统的的拉回吸引子可以随时间演化而变形,但拉回吸引子的相体积(测度)是守恒的.

参考文献

Temam R. Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics. Berlin: Springer, 1997

[本文引用: 1]

Feireisl E , Laurencot P , Simondon F .

Global attarctor for degenetate parabolic equations unbounded domains

J Differential Equations, 1996, 129, 239- 261

DOI:10.1006/jdeq.1996.0117      [本文引用: 1]

Li Y , Wei J .

Asymptotic dynamics for reaction diffusion equations in unbounded domain

J Appl Anal Comp, 2018, 8, 1186- 1193

Wang B .

Attractors for reaction diffusion equations in unbounded domains

Physica D, 1999, 128, 41- 52

DOI:10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00304-2      [本文引用: 1]

Li C , Li D , Zhang Z .

Dynamic bifurcation from infinity of nonlinear evolution equations

SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst, 2017, 16, 1831- 1868

DOI:10.1137/16M1107358      [本文引用: 1]

Bates P W , Lu K , Wang B .

Attractors for lattice dynamical systems

Inter J Bifur Choas, 2001, 11 (1): 143- 153

DOI:10.1142/S0218127401002031      [本文引用: 1]

Chow S N. Lattice Dynamical Systems//Macki J W, Zecca P, et al. Dynamical Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2003: 1-102

[本文引用: 1]

Keener J P .

Propagation and its failure in coupled systems of discrete excitable cells

SIAM J Appl Math, 1987, 47, 556- 572

DOI:10.1137/0147038      [本文引用: 1]

Erneux T , Nicolis G .

Propagating waves in discrete bistable reaction diffusion systems

Physica D, 1993, 67, 237- 244

DOI:10.1016/0167-2789(93)90208-I      [本文引用: 1]

Fabiny L , Colet P , Roy R .

Coherence and phase dynamics of spatially coupled solid-state lasers

Phys Rev A, 1993, 47, 4287- 4296

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.47.4287      [本文引用: 1]

Hillert M .

A solid-solution model for inhomogeneous systems

Acta Metall, 1961, 9, 525- 535

DOI:10.1016/0001-6160(61)90155-9      [本文引用: 1]

Chow S N , Mallet Paret J , Van Vleck E S .

Pattern formation and spatial chaos in spatially discrete evolution equations

Rand Comp Dyn, 1996, 4, 109- 178

[本文引用: 1]

Wang B .

Dynamics of systems on infinite lattices

J Differential Equations, 2006, 221, 224- 245

DOI:10.1016/j.jde.2005.01.003      [本文引用: 1]

Zhou S , Shi W .

Attractors and dimension of dissipative lattice systems

J Differential Equations, 2006, 224, 172- 204

DOI:10.1016/j.jde.2005.06.024      [本文引用: 1]

Wang B .

Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous lattice systems

J Math Anal Appl, 2007, 331, 121- 136

DOI:10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.070      [本文引用: 1]

Zhao C , Zhou S .

Compact kernel sections for nonautonomous Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger equations on infinite lattices

J Math Anal Appl, 2007, 332, 32- 56

DOI:10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.10.002     

Zhao X , Zhou S .

Kernel sections for processes and nonautonomous lattice systems

Discrete Cont Dyn Syst-B, 2008, 9, 763- 785

DOI:10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.763     

Zhou S , Zhao C .

Compact uniform attractors for dissipative non-autonomous lattice dynamical systems

Comm Pure Appl Anal, 2007, 21, 1087- 1111

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Zhao C , Zhou S .

Attractors of retarded first order lattice systems

Nonlinearity, 2007, 20, 1987- 2006

DOI:10.1088/0951-7715/20/8/010      [本文引用: 1]

Han X , Shen W , Zhou S .

Random attractors for stochastic lattice dynamical systems in weighted spaces

J Differential Equations, 2011, 250, 1235- 1266

DOI:10.1016/j.jde.2010.10.018      [本文引用: 1]

Zhao C , Zhou S .

Sufficient conditions for the existence of global random attractors for stochastic lattice dynamical systems and applications

J Math Anal Appl, 2009, 354, 78- 95

DOI:10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.12.036     

Zhou S .

Random exponential attractor for cocycle and application to non-autonomous stochastic lattice systems with multiplicative white noise

J Differential Equations, 2017, 263, 2247- 2279

DOI:10.1016/j.jde.2017.03.044      [本文引用: 1]

Abdallah Ahmed Y .

Exponential attractors for first-order lattice dynamical systems

J Math Anal Appl, 2008, 339, 217- 224

DOI:10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.054      [本文引用: 1]

Abdallah Ahmed Y .

Uniform exponential attractors for first order non-autonomous lattice dynamical systems

J Differential Equations, 2011, 251, 1489- 1504

DOI:10.1016/j.jde.2011.05.030     

赵才地, 周盛凡.

格点系统存在指数吸引子的充分条件及应用

数学学报, 2010, 53, 233- 242

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3085.2010.02.006      [本文引用: 1]

Zhao C , Zhou S .

Sufficient conditions for the existence of exponential attractor for lattice system

Acta Math Sinica, 2010, 53, 233- 242

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3085.2010.02.006      [本文引用: 1]

Zhao C , Xue G , Łukaszewicz G .

Pullback attractors and invariant measures for discrete Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger equations

Discrete Cont Dyn Syst-B, 2018, 23, 4021- 4044

[本文引用: 3]

Foias C , Manley O , Rosa R , Temam R . Navier-Stokes Equations and Turbulence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001

[本文引用: 5]

Wang X .

Upper-semicontinuity of stationary statistical properties of dissipative systems

Discrete Cont Dyn Syst, 2009, 23, 521- 540

[本文引用: 2]

Lukaszewicz G , Real R , Robinson J C .

Invariant measures for dissipative dynamical systems and generalised Banach limits

J Dyn Differential Equations, 2011, 23, 225- 250

DOI:10.1007/s10884-011-9213-6      [本文引用: 2]

Chekroun M , Glatt-Holtz N E .

Invariant measures for dissipative dynamical systems:Abstract results and applications

Comm Math Phys, 2012, 316, 723- 761

DOI:10.1007/s00220-012-1515-y      [本文引用: 3]

Lukaszewicz G , Robinson J C .

Invariant measures for non-autonomous dissipative dynamical systems

Discrete Cont Dyn Syst, 2014, 34, 4211- 4222

DOI:10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4211      [本文引用: 2]

Zhao C , Yang L .

Pullback attractor and invariant measure for the globally modified Navier-Stokes equations

Comm Math Sci, 2017, 15, 1565- 1580

DOI:10.4310/CMS.2017.v15.n6.a4      [本文引用: 1]

赵才地, 李艳娇, 阳玲, 张明书.

Ladyzhenskaya流体力学方程组的拉回吸引子与不变测度

数学学报, 2018, 61, 823- 834

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0583-1431.2018.05.012      [本文引用: 1]

Zhao C , Li Y , Yang L , Zhang M .

Pullback attractor and invariant measures for Ladyzhenskaya model

Acta Math Sinica, 2018, 61, 823- 834

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0583-1431.2018.05.012      [本文引用: 1]

Zhu Z , Zhao C .

Pullback attractor and invariant measures for the three-dimensional regularized MHD equations

Discrete Cont Dyn Syst, 2018, 38, 1461- 1477

DOI:10.3934/dcds.2018060      [本文引用: 1]

Zhao C , Caraballo T .

Asymptotic regularity of trajectory attractor and trajectory statistical solution for the 3D globally modified Navier-Stokes equations

J Differential Equations, 2019, 66, 7205- 7229

[本文引用: 1]

郑志刚, 胡岗. 从动力学到统计物理学. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016

[本文引用: 1]

Zheng Z , Hu G . From Dynamics to Statistical Mechanics. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 2016

[本文引用: 1]

/