Acta mathematica scientia,Series A ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1104-1110.
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Shuai, CHEN Jian-He, ZHOU Zhe-Yan
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金(11201072, 11102041)资助.
Abstract:
This paper considers second-order semi-linear non-autonomous singularly perturbed boundary value problem under the non-hyperbolic condition. Firstly, we construct the algebraic decay boundary layers by using the method of boundary layer functions. Hence, we obtain the uniformly valid asymptotic solution. Then, based on the obtained asymptotic solution, we define a couple of upper and lower solutions suitably, and prove the existence of solutions, the uniform validity of the asymptotic solution as well as the error estimate between the asymptotic and the exact solutions. Finally, a typical example is performed to verify the correctness of the theoretical result.
Key words: Boundary function method, Algebraic decay, Asymptotic solutions
CLC Number:
LIU Shuai, CHEN Jian-He, ZHOU Zhe-Yan. Asymptotic Solution for Second-order Semilinear Singularly Perturbed Boundary Value Problems[J].Acta mathematica scientia,Series A, 2014, 34(5): 1104-1110.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: http://121.43.60.238/sxwlxbA/EN/
http://121.43.60.238/sxwlxbA/EN/Y2014/V34/I5/1104
[1] Fenichel N. Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J Differential Equations, 1979, 31: 53--98 [2] Vasil'eva A B. The Boundary Function Method for Singularly Perturbed Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics, 1995 [3] 章国华, 侯斯著, 林宗池等译. 非线性奇异摄动现象: 理论和应用. 福州: 福建科学技术出版社, 1989 [4] Roberts S M. On the solution of $\varepsilon y''=y3. J Optim Theory Appl, 1986, 50: 535--541 [5] 史少云. 化学催化反应过程中的一类奇异摄动边值问题[M]. 长春:吉林大学, 1996 [6] 倪明康, 丁海云. 具有代数衰减的边界层问题. 数学杂志, 2011, 31(3): 488--494 [7] 刘帅, 周哲彦, 沈建和. 二阶半线性奇摄动边值问题解的渐近行为. 数学物理学报, 2014, 34A(2): 437--444
Cited
The Flow-capturing Location-allocation Model with Risk Bottleneck Limitation