CS-MRI 中评价随机欠采样矩阵的新方法

doi:10.11938/cjmr20150404

波谱学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 584-595.doi: 10.11938/cjmr20150404

CS-MRI 中评价随机欠采样矩阵的新方法

肖洒^1,2，吕植成¹，孙献平¹，叶朝辉¹，周欣^1*

1. 波谱与原子分子物理国家重点实验室，中国科学院生物磁共振分析重点实验室，武汉磁共振中心（中国科学院武汉物理与数学研究所），湖北武汉 430071；
2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2015-02-15 修回日期:2015-10-22 出版日期:2015-12-05 发布日期:2015-12-05
作者简介:肖洒(1990-)，男，湖北襄阳人，博士研究生，分析化学专业，主要研究方向为磁共振图像重建与压缩感知． *通讯联系人：周欣，电话： 027-87198802， E-mail: xinzhou@wipm.ac.cn.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(81227902, 11174327)

A New Method for Evaluation of Random Undersampling Matrix in Compressed Sensing-MRI

XIAO Sa^1,2，LV Zhi-cheng¹，SUN Xian-ping¹，YE Chao-hui¹，ZHOU Xin^1*

1. State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan (Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Wuhan 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2015-02-15 Revised:2015-10-22 Online:2015-12-05 Published:2015-12-05
About author:*Corresponding author： ZHOU Xin, Tel: +86-27-87198802, E-mail: xinzhou@wipm.ac.cn.
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(81227902, 11174327)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在压缩感知-磁共振成像(CS-MRI)中，随机欠采样矩阵与重建图像质量密切相关．而选取随机欠采样矩阵一般是通过计算点扩散函数(PSF)，以可能产生的伪影的最大值为评价参数，评估欠采样对图像重建的影响，然而最大值只反应了伪影的最坏情况．该文引入了两种新的统计学评价参数平均值(MV)和标准差(SD)，其中平均值评估了伪影的平均大小，标准差可以反映伪影的波动情况．该文分别使用这3种参数对小鼠和人体脑部MRI数据以不同的采样比率进行CS图像重建，实验结果表明，当采样比率不低于4倍稀疏度时，使用平均值获得了质量更优的重建图像．因此，通过稀疏度先验知识指导合理选取采样比率，并以平均值为评价参数选取随机欠采样矩阵，能够获得更优的CS-MRI重建图像．

关键词: 磁共振成像(MRI), 压缩感知, 随机欠采样矩阵, 点扩散函数

Abstract:

In compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI), the quality of reconstructed image is largely determined by the random undersampling matrix. It is a common practice to select the random undersampling matrix though computation of the point spread function (PSF) and the maximal artifacts possible. In this paper, we proposed to use two novel statistical parameters, mean value (MV) and standard deviation (SD), to guide the selection of random undersampling matrix. The two parameters evaluate the average amplitude and fluctuation of the possible artifacts, respectively. Experiments on mice brain and human brain were used to compare image quality of CS reconstructions of MRI data acquired with random undersampling matrices determined by different criteria. It was shown that reconstruction with MV had better performance when the sampling ratio is above four times of sparsity. It is concluded that better CS-MRI reconstruction quality can be achieved with reasonable selection of sampling ratio guided by prior knowledge of sparsity and MV as random undersampling matrix evaluation parameter.

Key words: MRI, compressed sensing, random undersampling matrix, point spread function

中图分类号:

O482.53

肖洒1,2，吕植成1，孙献平1，叶朝辉1，周欣1*. CS-MRI 中评价随机欠采样矩阵的新方法
[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(4): 584-595.

XIAO Sa1,2， LV Zhi-cheng1， SUN Xian-ping1， YE Chao-hui1， ZHOU Xin1*. A New Method for Evaluation of Random Undersampling Matrix in Compressed Sensing-MRI
[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2015, 32(4): 584-595.

参考文献

[1] Candes E J, Romberg J K, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information[J]. IEEE T Inform Theory, 2006, 52(2): 489－509.

[2] Donoho D L. Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE T Inform Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1 289－1 306.

[3] Candes E J, Tao T. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies[J]. IEEE T Inform Theory, 2006, 52(12): 5 406－5 425.

[4] Wech T, Lemke A, Medway D, et al. Accelerating cine-MR imaging in mouse hearts using compressed sensing[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2011, 34(5): 1 072－1 079.

[5] Gao Ming-sheng(高明生), Xie Hai-bin(谢海滨), Yan Xu(严序), et al. Selective dual-direction sequential compressed sensing for dynamic MR imaging(选择性双向顺序压缩感知重建动态磁共振成像)[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson(波谱学杂志), 2013, 30(2): 194－203.

[6] Li Hai-dong(李海东), Zhang Zhi-ying(张智颖), Han Ye-qing(韩叶清), et al. Lung MRI using hyperpolarized gases(超极化气体肺部磁共振成像)[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson(波谱学杂志), 2014, 31(3): 307－320.

[7] Lustig M, Donoho D L, Pauly J M. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2007, 58(6): 1 182－1 195.

[8] Lustig M, Donoho D L, Santos J M, et al. Compressed sensing MRI[J]. IEEE Signal Proc Mag, 2008, 25(2): 72－82.

[9] Ajraoui S, Lee K J, Deppe M H, et al. Compressed sensing in hyperpolarized He-3 lung MRI[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2010, 63(4): 1 059－1 069.

[10] Qu X B, Zhang W R, Guo D, et al. Iterative thresholding compressed sensing MRI based on contourlet transform[J]. Inverse Probl Sci En, 2010, 18(6):737－758.

[11] Ravishankar S, Bresler Y. MR image reconstruction from highly undersampled k-space data by dictionary learning[J]. IEEE T Med Imaging, 2011, 30(5): 1 028－1 041.

[12] Qu X B, Guo D, Ning B D, et al. Undersampled MRI reconstruction with patch-based directional wavelets[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 30(7): 964－977.

[13] Song Y, Zhu Z, Lu Y, et al. Reconstruction of magnetic resonance imaging by three-dimensional dual-dictionary learning[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2014, 71(3): 1 285－1 298.

[14] Qu X B, Hou Y K, Lam F, et al. Magnetic resonance image reconstruction from undersampled measurements using a patch-based nonlocal operator[J]. Med Image Anal, 2014, 18(6): 843－856.

[15] Chen S S B, Donoho D L, Saunders M A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit[J]. Siam J Sci Comput, 1998, 20(1): 33－61.

[16] Ye J C, Tak S, Han Y, et al. Projection reconstruction MR imaging using FOCUSS[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2007, 57(4): 764－775.

[17] Donoho D L, Elad M, Temlyakov V N. Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise[J]. IEEE T Inform Theory, 2006, 52(1): 6－18.

[18] Daubechies I, Defrise M, De Mol C. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint[J]. Commun Pur Appl Math, 2004, 57(11): 1 413－1 457.

[19] Starck J L, Elad M, Donoho D L. Image decomposition via the combination of sparse representations and a variational approach[J]. IEEE T Image Process, 2005, 14(10): 1 570－1 582.

[20] Elad M, Matalon B, Zibulevsky M. Coordinate and subspace optimization methods for linear least squares with non-quadratic regularization[J]. Appl Comput Harmon Anal, 2007, 23(3): 346－367.

[21] Kim S J, Koh K, Lustig M, et al. An interior-point method for large-scale l(1)-regularized least squares[J]. IEEE J STSP, 2007, 1(4): 606－617.

[22] Ajraoui S, Parra-Robles J, Wild J M. Incorporation of prior knowledge in compressed sensing for faster acquisition of hyperpolarized gas images[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2013, 69(2): 360－369.

[23] Imai H, Kimura A, Hori Y, et al. Hyperpolarized ¹²⁹Xe lung MRI in spontaneously breathing mice with respiratory gated fast imaging and its application to pulmonary functional imaging[J]. NMR Biomed, 2011, 24(10): 1 343－1 352.

[24] Pang Y, Zhang X. Interpolated compressed sensing for 2D multiple slice fast MR imaging[J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8(2): e56098.

[25] Candes E J, Wakin M B. An introduction to compressive sampling[J]. IEEE Signal Proc Mag, 2008, 25(2): 21－30.

[26] Sun Yu-bao(孙玉宝), Wei Zhi-hui(韦志辉), Wu Min(吴敏), et al. Image poisson denoising using sparse representations (稀疏性正则化的图像泊松去噪算法)[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica(电子学报), 2011, 39(2): 285－290.

[27] Fang L, Li S, Nie Q, et al. Sparsity based denoising of spectral domain optical coherence tomography images[J]. Biomedical Opt Express, 2012, 3(5): 927－942.

CS-MRI 中评价随机欠采样矩阵的新方法

A New Method for Evaluation of Random Undersampling Matrix in Compressed Sensing-MRI

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柴青焕, 苏冠群, 聂生东. 双树小波变换与小波树稀疏联合的低场CS-MRI算法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2018, 35(4): 486-497.
[2]	黄丽洁, 宋阳, 赵献策, 谢海滨, 吴东梅, 杨光. 一种结合并行成像和压缩感知的快速磁共振成像新方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2018, 35(1): 31-39.
[3]	罗庆, 张成秀, 李文静, 郑慧, 谢海滨, 杨光. 一种新的磁共振图像处理流水线的设计与实现[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2018, 35(1): 40-51.
[4]	宋阳, 谢海滨, 杨光. 用于压缩感知磁共振成像的分割字典学习算法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2016, 33(4): 559-569.
[5]	庄孝星, 马崚嶒, 蔡聪波, 陈忠. 一种基于时空变换和压缩感知的磁共振螺旋采样的图像重建算法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2016, 33(4): 549-558.
[6]	聂莉莎, 蒋滨, 张许, 刘买利. 基于压缩感知/重采样的NMR噪声抑制新方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2016, 33(2): 244-256.
[7]	高芒, 谢海滨, 李智敏, 张成秀, 奚伟, 姜小平, 杨光. 压缩感知同步扫描重建及其采样方案的研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2016, 33(2): 257-268.
[8]	韩明月，郑慧，胡炳文，杨光. 迭代软阈值法压缩感知重建谱峰较宽的二维固体谱 [J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(4): 551-562.
[9]	张苗1，卢建华2，蔡聪波3，蔡淑惠1. 7 T* 下脂肪对基于 NOE 的磁共振对比成像的影响 [J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(4): 606-617.
[10]	杨保联*. 超高场磁共振人体成像应用研究和医学前景 [J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(4): 707-714.
[11]	董芳，王前锋，郑慧，李智敏，杨光，李建奇*. 结合导航回波与压缩感知进行运动伪影矫正[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(3): 419-429.
[12]	李智敏1，谢海滨1，周敏雄1，张成秀2，奚伟2，姜小平2，杨光1. 基于稀疏重建的磁共振图像尖峰噪声消除方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(1): 40-50.
[13]	郑慧，韩明月，胡炳文，杨光. 不同采样模式的固体DQ-SQ 实验的压缩感知重建比较[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2014, 31(4): 535-547.
[14]	高明生，谢海滨，严序，周敏雄，李智敏，杨光*. 选择性双向顺序压缩感知重建动态磁共振成像[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2013, 30(2): 194-203.