氧化物纳米材料表面结构与性质的固体核磁共振波谱研究

doi:10.11938/cjmr20212936

波谱学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 533-542.doi: 10.11938/cjmr20212936

氧化物纳米材料表面结构与性质的固体核磁共振波谱研究

夏锡锋¹,张文静²,林芝晔²,柯晓康²,温玉洁²,王芳²,陈俊超^2,*(),彭路明^2,*()

1. 分析测试中心, 南京理工大学, 江苏南京 210094
2. 介观化学教育部重点实验室和生命化学协同创新中心, 化学化工学院, 南京大学, 江苏南京 210023

收稿日期:2021-07-13 出版日期:2021-12-05 发布日期:2021-08-18
通讯作者: 陈俊超,彭路明 E-mail:cjcnuaa@163.com;luming@nju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(91745202);国家自然科学基金资助项目(21972066);国家自然科学基金资助项目(21661130149)

Solid-State NMR Studies on the Surface Structure and Properties of Oxide Nanomaterials

Xi-feng XIA¹,Wen-jing ZHANG²,Zhi-ye LIN²,Xiao-kang KE²,Yu-jie WEN²,Fang WANG²,Jun-chao CHEN^2,*(),Lu-ming PENG^2,*()

1. Analysis and Testing Center, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
2. Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry of Ministry of Education and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Life Sciences, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2021-07-13 Online:2021-12-05 Published:2021-08-18
Contact: Jun-chao CHEN,Lu-ming PENG E-mail:cjcnuaa@163.com;luming@nju.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氧化物纳米材料的多种应用与其表面结构和性质密切相关.近年来，固体核磁共振波谱在相关研究中提供了关键信息.本综述总结了近期发展的、以固体核磁共振波谱为主的两种表征氧化物纳米材料表面结构和性质的方法，包括表面选择的同位素标记¹⁷O核磁共振波谱与动态核极化表面增强核磁共振波谱，并对氧化物纳米材料的固体核磁共振波谱研究的发展趋势进行了展望.

关键词: 氧化物纳米材料, 表面结构与性质, 氧-17, 固体核磁共振波谱, 动态核极化

Abstract:

Many applications of oxide nanomaterials depend on their surface structure and properties. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has been used to obtain such key information in related studies. This paper summarizes two recently developed approaches based on solid-state NMR spectroscopy for determining the surface structure and properties of oxide nanomaterials, including surface-selective isotopic labeling ¹⁷O NMR and dynamic nuclear polarization surface enhanced NMR spectroscopy. The development trend for investigating oxide nanomaterials with solid-state NMR spectroscopy is also introduced.

Key words: oxide nanomaterials, surface structure and properties, ¹⁷O, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, dynamic nuclear polarization

中图分类号:

O482.53

夏锡锋,张文静,林芝晔,柯晓康,温玉洁,王芳,陈俊超,彭路明. 氧化物纳米材料表面结构与性质的固体核磁共振波谱研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2021, 38(4): 533-542.

Xi-feng XIA,Wen-jing ZHANG,Zhi-ye LIN,Xiao-kang KE,Yu-jie WEN,Fang WANG,Jun-chao CHEN,Lu-ming PENG. Solid-State NMR Studies on the Surface Structure and Properties of Oxide Nanomaterials[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2021, 38(4): 533-542.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 35

1	YANG P D . Crystal cuts on the nanoscale[J]. Nature, 2012, 482, 41- 42. doi: 10.1038/482041a
2	LI Y , SHEN W J . Morphology-dependent nanocatalysts: rod-shaped oxides[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43 (5): 1543- 1574. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60296F
3	XIE X W , LI Y , LIU Z Q , et al. Low-temperature oxidation of CO catalysed by Co₃O₄ nanorods[J]. Nature, 2009, 458 (7239): 746- 749. doi: 10.1038/nature07877
4	ZHOU K B , LI Y D . Catalysis based on nanocrystals with well-defined facets[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51 (3): 602- 613. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102619
5	LI Y H , WU X P , JIANG N X , et al. Distinguishing faceted oxide nanocrystals with ¹⁷O solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8, 581. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00603-7
6	Chapter 7: Basics of X-ray diffraction[M]. Scintag, Inc, 1999.
7	DU J H , PENG L M . Recent progress in investigations of surface structure and properties of solid oxide materials with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy[J]. Chin Chem Lett, 2018, 29 (6): 747- 751. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.02.012
8	VOGT T, DAHMEN W, BINEV P. Modeling nanoscale imaging in electron microscopy[M]. Springer, 2012.
9	MARCHETTI A , CHEN J , PANG Z F , et al. Understanding surface and interfacial chemistry in functional nanomaterials via solid-state NMR[J]. Adv Mater, 2017, 29 (14): 1605895. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605895
10	LEVITT M H. Spin dynamics: basics of nuclear magnetic resonance[M]. Second edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008.
11	PENG L M , LIU Y , KIM N , et al. Detection of Bronsted acid sites in zeolite HY with high-field ¹⁷O-MAS-NMR techniques[J]. Nat Mater, 2005, 4, 216- 219. doi: 10.1038/nmat1332
12	ZHENG A M , LI S H , LIU S B , et al. Acidic properties and structure-activity correlations of solid acid catalysts revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2016, 49 (4): 655- 663. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00007
13	ZHENG A M , LIU S B , DENG F . ³¹P NMR chemical shifts of phosphorus probes as reliable and practical acidity scales for solid and liquid catalysts[J]. Chem Rev, 2017, 117 (19): 12475- 12531. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00289
14	MACKENZIE K J D, SMITH M E. Multinuclear solid-state NMR of inorganic materials[M]. Pergamon, 2002.
15	WANG M , WU X P , ZHENG S J , et al. Identification of different oxygen species in oxide nanostructures with ¹⁷O solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Sci Adv, 2015, 1 (1): e1400133. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400133
16	CHEN J C , WU X P , HOPE M A , et al. Polar surface structure of oxide nanocrystals revealed with solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10, 5420. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13424-7
17	CHEN J C , HOPE M A , LIN Z Y , et al. Interactions of oxide surfaces with water revealed with solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142 (25): 11173- 11182. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c03760
18	SHEN L , WANG Y , DU J H , et al. Probing interactions of γ-alumina with water via multinuclear solids-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Chem Cat Chem, 2020, 12 (6): 1569- 1574.
19	CHAMPOURET Y , COPPEL Y , KAHN M L . Evidence for core oxygen dynamics and exchange in metal oxide nanocrystals from in situ ¹⁷O MAS NMR[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138 (50): 16322- 16328. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08769
20	XU M , CHEN J C , WEN Y J , et al. ¹⁷O solid-state NMR studies of Ta₂O₅ nanorods[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5 (14): 8355- 8361. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00874
21	SHEN L , WU X P , WANG Y , et al. ¹⁷O solid-state NMR studies of ZrO₂ nanoparticles[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123 (7): 4158- 4167. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11091
22	LI Y H , WU X P , LIU C . NMR and EPR studies of partially reduced TiO₂[J]. Acta Phys Chim Sin, 2020, 36 (4): 1905021.
23	WANG Q , LI W Z , HUNG I , et al. Mapping the oxygen structure of gamma-Al₂O₃ by high-field solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11, 3620. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17470-4
24	LIU L , CHEN X B . Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Self-structural modifications[J]. Chem Rev, 2014, 114 (19): 9890- 9818. doi: 10.1021/cr400624r
25	CARVER T R , SLICHTER C P . Polarization of nuclear spins in metals[J]. Phys Rev, 1953, 92, 212- 213.
26	LESAGE A , LELLI M , GAJAN D , et al. Surface enhanced NMR spectroscopy by dynamic nuclear polarization[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132 (44): 15459- 15461. doi: 10.1021/ja104771z
27	SONG C , HU K N , JOO C G , et al. TOTAPOL: A biradical polarizing agent for dynamic nuclear polarization experiments in aqueous media[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128 (35): 11385- 11390. doi: 10.1021/ja061284b
28	REIF B , ASHBROOK S E , EMSLEY L , et al. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Nat Rev Methods Primers, 2021, 1, 2. doi: 10.1038/s43586-020-00002-1
29	LAFON O , THANKAMONY A S L , ROSAY M , et al. Indirect and direct ²⁹Si dynamic nuclear polarization of dispersed nanoparticles[J]. Chem Commun, 2013, 49 (28): 2864- 2866. doi: 10.1039/C2CC36170A
30	BLANC F , SPERRIN L , JEFFERSON D A , et al. Dynamic nuclear polarization enhanced natural abundance ¹⁷O spectroscopy[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135 (8): 2975- 2978. doi: 10.1021/ja4004377
31	PERRAS F A , KOBAYASHI T , PRUSKI M . Natural abundance ¹⁷O DNP two-dimensional and surface-enhanced NMR spectroscopy[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137 (26): 8336- 8339. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03905
32	ZHAO X , HOFFBAUER W , SCHMEDT AUF DER GUNNE J , et al. Heteronuclear polarization transfer by symmetry-based recoupling sequences in solid-state NMR[J]. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson, 2004, 26 (2): 57- 64. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2003.11.001
33	HOPE M A , HALAT D M , MAGUSIN P C M M , et al. Surface-selective direct ¹⁷O DNP NMR of CeO₂ nanoparticles[J]. Chem Commun, 2017, 53, 2142- 2145. doi: 10.1039/C6CC10145C
34	VITZTHUM V , MIEVILLE P , CARNEVALE D , et al. Dynamic nuclear polarization of quadrupolar nuclei using cross polarization from protons: surface-enhanced aluminium-27 NMR[J]. Chem Commun, 2012, 48, 1988- 1990. doi: 10.1039/c2cc15905h
35	LI W Z , WANG Q , XU J , et al. Probing the surface of γ-Al₂O₃ by oxygen-17 dynamic nuclear polarization enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2018, 20 (25): 17218- 17225. doi: 10.1039/C8CP03132K

[1]	杨文杰,黄骏. 基于固体核磁共振技术的固体酸结构、酸性及活性分析[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2021, 38(4): 460-473.
[2]	高珊, 黄重阳, 张震, 陈俊飞, 贺玉贵, 陈黎, 陈方, 张金枝, 刘朝阳. DITFB/4-OH-TEMPO体系中卤键作用的¹⁹F DNP研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2017, 34(4): 421-428.
[3]	刘早, 朱天雄, 贺玉贵, 陈俊飞, 冯继文, 刘朝阳. DNP-EPR多功能谱仪中微波桥的设计与实现[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2017, 34(3): 357-364.
[4]	陶泉, 贺玉贵, 王超, 冯继文, 陈方, 刘朝阳 . TM₁₁₀模式DNP探头的研制与应用[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2016, 33(1): 44-53.
[5]	贺玉贵1,2，冯继文1，张志1,3，王超1,3，倪胜1，胡少斌1，王东1，陈方1，刘买利1，刘朝阳1. 脉冲动态核极化增强的NMR 和MRI 系统研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(2): 393-398.
[6]	郭小永, 严宝珍, 郭洪玲, 田秋, 刘扬. 时间分辨CIDNP技术[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2003, 20(1): 91-100.
[7]	方可, 周建威, 谭萍, 刘朝阳, 曾凡明, 邱衍军, 裘鉴卿, 叶朝辉. 动态核极化谱仪的技术改造[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2000, 17(3): 259-263.
[8]	杨保联, 胡红兵, 周建威, 李丽云, 裘鉴卿, 曾凡明, 胡建治, 叶朝辉. 固体高分辨DNP CP/MAS探头的研制及DNP实验技术的探讨[J]. 波谱学杂志, 1996, 13(2): 183-190.
[9]	刘中立. 化学诱导动态核极化[J]. 波谱学杂志, 1995, 12(5): 483-494.

氧化物纳米材料表面结构与性质的固体核磁共振波谱研究

Solid-State NMR Studies on the Surface Structure and Properties of Oxide Nanomaterials

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 35

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价