波谱学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 275-282.doi: 10.11938/cjmr20162553

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

1.5 T磁共振化学交换饱和转移成像的影响因素分析

杨永贵1, 陈忠2, 蔡聪波2, 郭岗1   

  1. 1. 厦门医学院附属医院, 厦门市第二医院 医学影像科, 福建 厦门 361021;
    2. 厦门大学 电子科学系, 福建省等离子体与磁共振研究重点实验室, 福建 厦门 361005
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-08 修回日期:2017-07-15 出版日期:2017-09-05 发布日期:2017-09-05
  • 通讯作者: 郭岗,Tel:0592-6159536,E-mail:guogangxm@163.com. E-mail:guogangxm@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    厦门市科技局科技惠民计划资助项目(3502Z20144052);卫生部福建省卫生教育联合攻关计划资助项目(WKJ-FJ-05).

Factors Affecting Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging on 1.5 T Clinical MRI Scanners

YANG Yong-gui1, CHEN Zhong2, CAI Cong-bo2, GUO Gang1   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, The 2nd Hospital of Xiamen, The Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361021, China;
    2. Department of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Received:2016-10-08 Revised:2017-07-15 Online:2017-09-05 Published:2017-09-05

摘要: 本文探讨1.5 T磁共振化学交换饱和转移(Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer,CEST)成像的影响因素.通过试管模型和临床病例,采用GE Signa HDe 1.5 T磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging,MRI)扫描仪分别进行不同矩阵、激励次数、翻转角、磁化传递翻转角的CEST成像对比分析,以及不同激励次数、磁化传递翻转角的Z谱分析,并从成像组织、成像设备、成像技术等方面对原始图信号、酰胺质子转移(Amide Proton Transfer,APT)信号及Z谱进行分析研究.实验结果表明1.5 T MRI扫描仪的CEST图像信噪比相对较低,且磁场稳定性及均匀度影响了CEST成像的效果.在其他参数不变的情况下,降低采集矩阵和增加激励次数与翻转角可以增加原始图像信噪比.磁化传递翻转角为105°时,CEST成像效果最好.激励次数为2、磁化传递翻转角为105°时,所得数据符合组织Z谱情况.模型Z谱在磁化传递频率为-294~-194 Hz范围可显示30%谷氨酸(Glu)、碘剂(I320)、纯水(H2O)、肌酸(Cr)的信号差异,与H2O差异最大处在-244~-214 Hz.原始图像信号30% I320明显高于Glu、H2O、Cr,Cr略低于Glu,APT图Cr略低于Glu.25例脑肿瘤的APT图呈高信号、12例脑梗塞的APT图呈低信号,CEST原始图像均可区分病变区域.有12例因采集时间、患者配合情况、环境及室温等影响导致CEST成像的失败.由此得出1.5 T场强下,CEST技术受到成像组织、设备、技术等因素的影响,需要进行多方面优化.在保证磁场稳定性及均匀度的情况下,优化参数的CEST成像和Z谱成像可以区分代谢物及其浓度.

关键词: 化学交换饱和转移(CEST), 酰胺质子转移(APT), 磁共振成像(MRI), 酸碱度

Abstract: Acquisition parameters for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging were optimized on a GE Signa HDe 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner with phantoms and clinical cases. The effects of matrix size, number of averages (NEX) and flip angles on the quality of CEST images were assessed. It was shown that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the CEST images acquired on the 1.5 T scanner was relatively low, and the stability and uniformity of the B0 field affected the outcome significantly. Reducing matrix size and increasing NEX improved the SNR of the CEST images. Optimal flip angle for magnetization transfer was found to be 105°. With a NEX of 2, usable Z spectra could be obtained. The Z spectra indicated that, with the saturation pulse frequency centered at -294~-194 Hz, signal differences could be observed for 30% Glu, I320, H2O, and Cr. Maximal signal differences were observed when the saturation pulse applied at -244~-214 Hz. Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging on patients showed that 25 cases of brain tumor had high CEST signals, 12 cases of cerebral infarction had low CEST signals. It was therefore possible to differentiate brain tumor from infarction with CEST imaging. There were also 12 cases which failed due to long acquisition time, patient movements, and temperature changes in the scanner room.

Key words: chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), amide proton transfer (APT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), pH

中图分类号: