实验性脊髓损伤后大脑血管可塑性的磁共振血管尺寸成像研究

doi:10.11938/cjmr20223036

波谱学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 158-168.doi: 10.11938/cjmr20223036

实验性脊髓损伤后大脑血管可塑性的磁共振血管尺寸成像研究

田雨^1,^2,³,周臣^2,³,张亚男^2,^3,⁴,王鹏⁴,张彩云⁴,宋天玮^2,^3,⁴,钱俊超^1,^2,^3,^*()

1.安徽医科大学基础医学院，安徽合肥 230032
2.中国科学院合肥肿瘤医院，安徽合肥 230031
3.中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院，健康与医学技术研究所，医学物理与技术安徽省重点实验室，安徽合肥 230031
4.滨州医学院，山东烟台 264003

收稿日期:2022-11-22 出版日期:2023-06-05 在线发表日期:2023-01-29
通讯作者: 钱俊超 E-mail:qianjunchao@hmfl.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1932158);国家自然科学基金资助项目(81871085);国家自然科学基金资助项目(82271519);山东省自然科学基金肿瘤防治联合基金重点项目(ZR2019LZL018);安徽省自然科学基金杰出青年项目(2208085J10);中国科学院合肥大科学中心协同创新培育基金重要项目(2019HSC-CIP003);中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M652403);山东省博士后创新项目(202002048)

In vivo MR Vessel Size Imaging of Brain Vascular Plasticity After Experimental Spinal Cord Injury

TIAN Yu^1,^2,³,ZHOU Chen^2,³,ZHANG Yanan^2,^3,⁴,WANG Peng⁴,ZHANG Caiyun⁴,SONG Tianwei^2,^3,⁴,QIAN Junchao^1,^2,^3,^*()

1. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
2. Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
3. Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
4. Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China

Received:2022-11-22 Published:2023-06-05 Online:2023-01-29
Contact: QIAN Junchao E-mail:qianjunchao@hmfl.ac.cn

1. 附件材料.pdf(292KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文应用7 T高场磁共振血管尺寸成像技术研究了大鼠脊髓半切损伤后大脑血管的可塑性．通过感兴趣区域分析发现，损伤4周后，与损伤部位同侧锥体相比，对侧锥体区域的平均血管直径、微血管密度和血管尺寸指数显著增加，提示对侧皮质脊髓束白质区域血管生成或活化．该结果经由免疫荧光实验证实，损伤4周后，对侧锥体区域血小板内皮细胞粘附分子和胶质纤维酸性蛋白的染色强度也显著增加．以上结果表明磁共振血管尺寸成像技术可为脊髓损伤后大脑相关区域的血管生成提供有价值的信息，并有可能成为诊断脊髓损伤患者脑部血管病变的新工具．

关键词: 大脑血管可塑性, 血管尺寸成像, 大鼠, 脊髓损伤, 高场磁共振成像

Abstract:

In vivo magnetic resonance vessel size imaging at 7 T high field was used to explore the changes in cerebral vascular plasticity after spinal cord hemisection injury in rats. Region of interest (ROI) analysis showed that four weeks after injury, mean vessel diameter (mVD), microvascular density (Density) and vessel size index (VSI) values were significantly increased in the contralateral side compared with the ipsilateral pyramid of the injury site, suggesting angiogenesis or vascular activation in the white matter region of the contralateral corticospinal tract (CST). Immunofluorescence results showed that the intensity of staining for platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (CD31) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) also increased significantly in the contralateral pyramid four weeks after injury. These results suggested that magnetic resonance vessel size imaging could provide valuable information on neovascularization in brain after spinal cord injury and may be a novel tool to diagnose brain vascular pathologies in spinal cord injury patients.

Key words: brain vascular plasticity, vessel size imaging, rats, spinal cord injury, high field magnetic resonance imaging

中图分类号:

田雨,周臣,张亚男,王鹏,张彩云,宋天玮,钱俊超. 实验性脊髓损伤后大脑血管可塑性的磁共振血管尺寸成像研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2023, 40(2): 158-168.

TIAN Yu,ZHOU Chen,ZHANG Yanan,WANG Peng,ZHANG Caiyun,SONG Tianwei,QIAN Junchao. In vivo MR Vessel Size Imaging of Brain Vascular Plasticity After Experimental Spinal Cord Injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2023, 40(2): 158-168.

图/表 5

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 48

[1]	WRIGLEY P J, GUSTIN S M, MACEY P M, et al. Anatomical changes in human motor cortex and motor pathways following complete thoracic spinal cord injury[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2009, 19(1): 224-232. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn072 pmid: 18483004
[2]	ILVESMäKI T, KOSKINEN E, BRANDER A, et al. Spinal cord injury induces widespread chronic changes in cerebral white matter[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017, 38(7): 3637-3647. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23619 pmid: 28429407
[3]	HE G, QIAN J. Phase imaging of axonal integrity of cranial corticospinal tract in experimental spinal cord injury at 9.4T[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2017, 80(9): 1009-1017. doi: 10.1002/jemt.v80.9
[4]	COHEN-ADAD J, EL MENDILI M M, LEHéRICY S, et al. Demyelination and degeneration in the injured human spinal cord detected with diffusion and magnetization transfer MRI[J]. Neuroimage, 2011, 55(3): 1024-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.089
[5]	MOXON K A, OLIVIERO A, AGUILAR J, et al. Cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury: always for good?[J]. Neuroscience, 2014, 283: 78-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.056 pmid: 24997269
[6]	JURKIEWICZ M T, MIKULIS D J, MCILROY W E, et al. Sensorimotor cortical plasticity during recovery following spinal cord injury: a longitudinal fMRI study[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2007, 21(6): 527-538. doi: 10.1177/1545968307301872
[7]	FASSETT H J, TURCO C V, EL-SAYES J, et al. Alterations in Motor Cortical representation of muscles following incomplete spinal cord injury in humans[J]. Brain Sci, 2018, 8(12).
[8]	WANG L, CHEN N. MRI research progresses of motor imagery on brain activity and network reorganization in patients with spinal cord injury[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2019, 35(10):1586-1589.
	王玲, 陈楠. 运动想象对脊髓损伤患者大脑活动和脑网络重塑MR研究进展[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(10): 1586-1589.
[9]	TSUJIOKA H, YAMASHITA T. Neural circuit repair after central nervous system injury[J]. Int Immunol, 2021, 33(6): 301-309. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxaa077 pmid: 33270108
[10]	LIU J, YANG X, JIANG L, et al. Neural plasticity after spinal cord injury[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2012, 7(5): 386-391. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.05.010 pmid: 25774179
[11]	YU S, YAO S, WEN Y, et al. Angiogenic microspheres promote neural regeneration and motor function recovery after spinal cord injury in rats[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 33428. doi: 10.1038/srep33428 pmid: 27641997
[12]	POTENTE M, GERHARDT H, CARMELIET P. Basic and therapeutic aspects of angiogenesis[J]. Cell, 2011, 146(6): 873-887. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.039 pmid: 21925313
[13]	LI X, LI M, TIAN L, et al. Reactive astrogliosis: implications in spinal cord injury progression and therapy[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2020, 2020: 9494352.
[14]	SHIMAMURA M, SATO N, SATA M, et al. Expression of hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met after spinal cord injury in rats[J]. Brain Res, 2007, 1151: 188-194. pmid: 17425951
[15]	NAKAMURA T, MIZUNO S. The discovery of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its significance for cell biology, life sciences and clinical medicine[J]. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci, 2010, 86(6): 588-610. doi: 10.2183/pjab.86.588
[16]	KITAMURA K, IWANAMI A, NAKAMURA M, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor promotes endogenous repair and functional recovery after spinal cord injury[J]. J Neurosci Res, 2007, 85(11): 2332-2342. pmid: 17549731
[17]	CHRISTOFORIDIS G A, YANG M, KONTZIALIS M S, et al. High resolution ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging of glioma microvascularity and hypoxia using ultra-small particles of iron oxide[J]. Invest Radiol, 2009, 44(7): 375-383. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a8afea pmid: 19448552
[18]	XU C, SCHMIDT W U, VILLRINGER K, et al. Vessel size imaging reveals pathological changes of microvessel density and size in acute ischemia[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2011, 31(8): 1687-1695. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.38
[19]	XU X, MENG T, WEN Q, et al. Dynamic changes in vascular size and density in transgenic mice with Alzheimer's disease[J]. Aging (Albany NY), 2020, 12(17): 17224-17234.
[20]	JIANG J J, ZHAO L Y, WANG C Y, et al. Initial application of magnetic resonance vessel size imaging in cerebral glioma and meningioma[J]. Radiol Practic, 2014, 29(7): 770-773.
	江晶晶, 赵凌云, 王承缘, 等. 磁共振血管大小成像在脑胶质瘤和脑膜瘤中的初步应用[J]. 放射学实践, 2014, 29(7): 770-773.
[21]	IELACQUA G D, SCHLEGEL F, FüCHTEMEIER M, et al. Magnetic resonance Q mapping reveals a decrease in microvessel density in the arcAβ mouse model of cerebral amyloidosis[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2015, 7: 241. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00241 pmid: 26834622
[22]	LEMASSON B, VALABLE S, FARION R, et al. In vivo imaging of vessel diameter, size, and density: a comparative study between MRI and histology[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2013, 69(1): 18-26. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24218 pmid: 22431289
[23]	HOL E M, PEKNY M. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the astrocyte intermediate filament system in diseases of the central nervous system[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2015, 32: 121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.02.004 pmid: 25726916
[24]	RAZAVI S M, YAHYAABADI R. Comparative study of correlation between angiogenesis markers (CD31) and Ki67 marker with behavior of aggressive and nonaggressive central giant cell granuloma with immunohistochemistry technique[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2018, 19(8): 2279-2283.
[25]	RAMU J, BOCKHORST K H, MOGATADAKALA K V, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in rodents: Methodology and application to spinal cord injury[J]. J Neurosci Res, 2006, 84(6): 1235-1244. pmid: 16941500
[26]	SHEN Y M, ZHENG W L, CHENG Y-C N, et al. USPIO high resolution neurovascular imaging in a rat stroke model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2014, 31(1): 20-31.
	沈伊民, 郑伟丽, CHENG Y-C N, 等. 大鼠中风模型的超小氧化铁粒子神经血管成像[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2014, 31(1): 20-31.
[27]	JIRJIS M B, VEDANTAM A, BUDDE M D, et al. Severity of spinal cord injury influences diffusion tensor imaging of the brain[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 43(1): 63-74. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24964 pmid: 26094789
[28]	LIDDELOW S A, BARRES B A. Reactive astrocytes: production, function, and therapeutic potential[J]. Immunity, 2017, 46(6): 957-967. doi: S1074-7613(17)30234-0 pmid: 28636962
[29]	SOFRONIEW M V. Reactive astrocytes in neural repair and protection[J]. Neuroscientist, 2005, 11(5): 400-407. doi: 10.1177/1073858405278321 pmid: 16151042
[30]	OKADA S, HARA M, KOBAYAKAWA K, et al. Astrocyte reactivity and astrogliosis after spinal cord injury[J]. Neurosci Res, 2018, 126: 39-43. doi: S0168-0102(17)30592-8 pmid: 29054466
[31]	HUSSEIN R K, MENCIO C P, KATAGIRI Y, et al. Role of chondroitin sulfation following spinal cord injury[J]. Front Cell Neurosci, 2020, 14: 208. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00208 pmid: 32848612
[32]	WANG Y, CHENG X, HE Q, et al. Astrocytes from the contused spinal cord inhibit oligodendrocyte differentiation of adult oligodendrocyte precursor cells by increasing the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins[J]. J Neurosci, 2011, 31(16): 6053-6058. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5524-09.2011 pmid: 21508230
[33]	YIU G, HE Z. Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2006, 7(8): 617-627. doi: 10.1038/nrn1956 pmid: 16858390
[34]	YANG T, DAI Y, CHEN G, et al. Dissecting the dual role of the glial scar and scar-forming astrocytes in spinal cord injury[J]. Front Cell Neurosci, 2020, 14: 78. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00078 pmid: 32317938
[35]	OKADA S, NAKAMURA M, KATOH H, et al. Conditional ablation of Stat3 or Socs3 discloses a dual role for reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury[J]. Nat Med, 2006, 12(7): 829-834. doi: 10.1038/nm1425 pmid: 16783372
[36]	SOFRONIEW M V. Astrocyte barriers to neurotoxic inflammation[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2015, 16(5): 249-263. doi: 10.1038/nrn3898 pmid: 25891508
[37]	LIU D, XU G Y, PAN E, et al. Neurotoxicity of glutamate at the concentration released upon spinal cord injury[J]. Neuroscience, 1999, 93(4): 1383-1389. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00278-x pmid: 10501463
[38]	MARAGAKIS N J, DYKES-HOBERG M, ROTHSTEIN J D. Altered expression of the glutamate transporter EAAT2b in neurological disease[J]. Ann Neurol, 2004, 55(4): 469-477. pmid: 15048885
[39]	CASELLA G T, MARCILLO A, BUNGE M B, et al. New vascular tissue rapidly replaces neural parenchyma and vessels destroyed by a contusion injury to the rat spinal cord[J]. Exp Neurol, 2002, 173(1): 63-76. pmid: 11771939
[40]	YAMANE K, MISAWA H, TAKIGAWA T, et al. Multipotent neurotrophic effects of hepatocyte growth factor in spinal cord injury[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(23) : 6078. doi: 10.3390/ijms20236078
[41]	MENEGHINI V, PEVIANI M, LUCIANI M, et al. Delivery platforms for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of glial cells in the central nervous system[J]. Front Genome Ed, 2021, 3: 644319. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.644319
[42]	LIBERTO C M, ALBRECHT P J, HERX L M, et al. Pro-regenerative properties of cytokine-activated astrocytes[J]. J Neurochem, 2004, 89(5): 1092-1100. pmid: 15147501
[43]	COLLOMBET J M, FOUR E, FAUQUETTE W, et al. Soman poisoning induces delayed astrogliotic scar and angiogenesis in damaged mouse brain areas[J]. Neurotoxicology, 2007, 28(1): 38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.07.011
[44]	BARTANUSZ V, JEZOVA D, ALAJAJIAN B, et al. The blood-spinal cord barrier: morphology and clinical implications[J]. Ann Neurol, 2011, 70(2): 194-206. doi: 10.1002/ana.22421 pmid: 21674586
[45]	WHETSTONE W D, HSU J Y, EISENBERG M, et al. Blood-spinal cord barrier after spinal cord injury: relation to revascularization and wound healing[J]. J Neurosci Res, 2003, 74(2): 227-239. pmid: 14515352
[46]	WAHIS J, HENNES M, ARCKENS L, et al. Star power: the emerging role of astrocytes as neuronal partners during cortical plasticity[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2021, 67: 174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2020.12.001 pmid: 33360483
[47]	CHUNG W S, ALLEN N J, EROGLU C. Astrocytes control synapse formation, function, and elimination[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2015, 7(9): a020370. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020370
[48]	WANG Y, FU A K Y, IP N Y. Instructive roles of astrocytes in hippocampal synaptic plasticity: neuronal activity-dependent regulatory mechanisms[J]. Febs J, 2022, 289(8): 2202-2218. doi: 10.1111/febs.v289.8

实验性脊髓损伤后大脑血管可塑性的磁共振血管尺寸成像研究

In vivo MR Vessel Size Imaging of Brain Vascular Plasticity After Experimental Spinal Cord Injury

RichHTML

PDF

评审附件

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 48

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马聪伟, 杨鸿毅, 钟凯. 高场磁共振成像¹H/³¹P双调谐射频线圈研究进展[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2021, 38(1): 118-139.
[2]	肖亮, 娄煜堃, 周航宇. 用于SAR估计的基于U-Net网络的快速膝关节模型重建[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37(2): 144-151.
[3]	黄育玲, 唐启盛, 李宁, 朱晨军. 颐脑解郁方对抑郁大鼠脑¹H波谱的干预作用[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2012, 29(3): 379-387.
[4]	安艳丽, 张洪英. 大鼠眼球的高场磁共振成像研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2010, 27(4): 630-634.
[5]	李宁, 唐启盛, 侯秀娟, 赵瑞珍, 黄育玲, 方芳, 臧凤超. 广泛性焦虑大鼠前额叶皮质和海马磁共振波谱的研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2010, 27(2): 185-193.
[6]	李艳丽, 王洪彬, 郭灿雄, 王梅, 严宝珍, 胡高飞, 邓玉林 . 利用基于¹H NMR的代谢组学分析研究重离子辐射对大鼠额叶皮质区的影响[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2010, 27(1): 103-112.
[7]	刘慧浪1，2; 朱航1，2 ; 夏圣安1，2 ; 刘买利1 . HR-MAS NMR研究大鼠颞叶、海马和内嗅皮质的生理代谢表征[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2008, 25(4): 478-485.
[8]	杨运煌, 臧颖, 刁芳明, 韩丹, 李丽云, 叶朝辉, 刘买利. 电刺激诱发大鼠慢性颞叶癫痫模型的磁共振成像和波谱特征的研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2004, 21(3): 281-288.
[9]	臧颖，韩丹，杨运煌，刘买利，邹祖玉，曾俊. 慢性电刺激海马结构诱发大鼠脑磁共振成像异常信号分析[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2001, 18(3): 193-200.