固体核磁共振技术在甲醇制烯烃反应中的应用

doi:10.11938/cjmr20212938

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

甲醇制烯烃过程是由非石油路线生成低碳烯烃的重要途径之一.分子筛因具备独特的孔结构和可调变的酸性质，而成为甲醇制烯烃过程的核心催化剂.固体核磁共振(NMR)是鉴定物质结构、阐释催化反应机理的强有力的工具，在甲醇制烯烃的研究中被广泛应用.本文主要总结了近年来利用原位固体NMR、多维多核NMR、脉冲梯度场NMR等固体NMR技术研究甲醇制烯烃反应机理取得的重要进展.原位固体NMR可以在真实反应条件下监测催化反应中反应物、中间体和产物的动态演变过程；多维多核NMR可以在不破坏催化剂结构情况下确定反应中间体结构信息，特别是¹²⁹Xe NMR可以很灵敏探测反应中催化剂的孔道结构变化；脉冲梯度场NMR可用于测定孔道内分子的扩散系数，阐明分子筛的扩散机制.

关键词: 原位固体核磁共振, 脉冲梯度场, ¹²⁹Xe核磁共振, 甲醇制烯烃, 反应机理

Abstract:

Methanol-to-olefins (MTO) is a prevalent industrial process for producing light olefins from the non-petroleum route. Molecular sieves are core catalysts for MTO owing to their unique pore structure and tunable acidity. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a powerful tool to elucidate the structure and interpret the catalytic reaction mechanism of the molecular sieves. In this review, we summarize the major progresses in understanding the MTO reaction mechanism with in-situ solid-state NMR, multi-dimensional and -nuclear NMR, ¹²⁹Xe NMR, and pulsed field gradient NMR (PFG NMR). In-situ solid-state NMR can monitor the dynamic changes of the reactants, intermediates and products under real reaction conditions. Multi-dimensional and multi-nuclear NMR offers rich structural information of the reaction intermediate without having to destroy the catalyst structure. Especially, ¹²⁹Xe NMR is applied to sensitively probe the pore structure of fresh and deactivated catalysts. PFG NMR could determine the diffusion coefficients of molecules in pores, and elucidate the diffusion mechanism of the molecular sieve.

Key words: in-situ solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, pulse field gradient, ¹²⁹Xe nuclear magnetic resonance, methanol-to-olefins, reaction mechanism

中图分类号:

O482.53

高树树,徐舒涛,魏迎旭,刘中民. 固体核磁共振技术在甲醇制烯烃反应中的应用[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2021, 38(4): 433-447.

Shu-shu GAO,Shu-tao XU,Ying-xu WEI,Zhong-min LIU. Applications of Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Methanol-to-Olefins Reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2021, 38(4): 433-447.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 86

1	CHANG C D , SILVESTRI A J . The conversion of methanol and other O-compounds to hydrocarbons over zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 1977, 47 (2): 249- 259. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(77)90172-5
2	TIAN P , WEI Y X , YE M , et al. Methanol to olefins (MTO): From fundamentals to commercialization[J]. ACS Catal, 2015, 5 (3): 1922- 1938. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00007
3	DUSSELIER M , DAVIS M E . Small-pore zeolites: Synthesis and catalysis[J]. Chem Rev, 2018, 118 (11): 5265- 5329. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00738
4	MOLINER M , MARTíNEZ C , CORMA A . Synthesis strategies for preparing useful small pore zeolites and zeotypes for gas separations and catalysis[J]. Chem Mater, 2014, 26 (1): 246- 258. doi: 10.1021/cm4015095
5	XU S T , ZHENG A M , WEI Y X , et al. Direct observation of cyclic carbenium ions and their role in the catalytic cycle of the methanol-to-olefin reaction over chabazite zeolites[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52 (44): 11564- 11568. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303586
6	XU J , WANG Q , DENG F . Metal active sites and their catalytic functions in zeolites: Insights from solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2019, 52 (8): 2179- 2189. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00125
7	ZHANG W P , XU S T , HAN X W , et al. In situ solid-state NMR for heterogeneous catalysis: a joint experimental and theoretical approach[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41 (1): 192- 210. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15009J
8	YI X F , LIU K Y , CHEN W , et al. Origin and structural characteristics of tri-coordinated extra-framework aluminum species in dealuminated zeolites[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140 (34): 10764- 10774. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b04819
9	LIN Z Y , HUO H , WANG Q H , et al. Progress in solid-state NMR studies of monoclinic lithium vanadium phosphate[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2020, 37 (1): 16- 27.
	林泽羽, 霍华, 王启航, 等. 固体核磁共振研究单斜磷酸钒锂的进展[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37 (1): 16- 27.
10	GAO X Z , ZHANG Y , WANG X M , et al. Structure and acidity changes in ultra-stable Y zeolites during hydrothermal aging: A solid-state NMR spectroscopy study NMR[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2020, 37 (1): 95- 103.
	高秀枝, 张翊, 王秀梅, 等. 研究超稳Y分子筛水热老化过程中结构与酸性的变化[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37 (1): 95- 103.
11	CHEN N Y , REAGAN W J . Evidence of autocatalysis in methanol to hydrocarbon reactions over zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 1979, 59 (1): 123- 129. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9517(79)80050-0
12	ONO Y , MORI T . Mechanism of methanol conversion into hydrocarbons over ZSM-5 zeolite[J]. J Chem Soc, Faraday Transactions 1, 1981, 77 (9): 2209- 2221. doi: 10.1039/f19817702209
13	DAHL I M , KOLBOE S . On the reaction mechanism for hydrocarbon formation from methanol over SAPO-34:2. Isotopic labeling studies of the co-reaction of propene and methanol[J]. J Catal, 1996, 161 (1): 304- 309. doi: 10.1006/jcat.1996.0188
14	MOLE T , WHITESIDE J A , SEDDON D . Aromatic co-catalysis of methanol conversion over zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 1983, 82 (2): 261- 266. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(83)90192-6
15	GUISNET M , COSTA L , RIBEIRO F R . Prevention of zeolite deactivation by coking[J]. J Mol Catal A: Chem, 2009, 305 (1-2): 69- 83. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2008.11.012
16	OLSBYE U , SVELLE S , BJØRGEN M , et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51 (24): 5810- 5831. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103657
17	STÖCKER M . Methanol-to-hydrocarbons: catalytic materials and their behavior[J]. Micropor Mesopor Mat, 1999, 29 (1-2): 3- 48. doi: 10.1016/S1387-1811(98)00319-9
18	MARCUS D M , MCLACHLAN K A , WILDMAN M A , et al. Experimental evidence from H/D exchange studies for the failure of direct C-C coupling mechanisms in the methanol-to-olefin process catalyzed by HSAPO-34[J]. Angew Chem, 2006, 118 (19): 3205- 3208. doi: 10.1002/ange.200504372
19	LESTHAEGHE D , VAN SPEYBROECK V , MARIN G B , et al. Understanding the failure of direct C-C Coupling in the zeolite-catalyzed methanol-to-olefin process[J]. Angew Chem, 2006, 118 (11): 1746- 1751. doi: 10.1002/ange.200503824
20	DESSAU R M , LAPIERRE R B . On the mechanism of methanol conversion to hydrocarbons over HZSM-5[J]. J Catal, 1982, 78 (1): 136- 141. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(82)90292-5
21	DAHL I M , KOLBOE S . On the reaction mechanism for hydrocarbon formation from methanol over SAPO-34:I. Isotopic labeling studies of the co-reaction of ethene and methanol[J]. J Catal, 1994, 149 (2): 458- 464. doi: 10.1006/jcat.1994.1312
22	WANG C , YI X F , XU J , et al. Experimental evidence on the formation of ethene through carbocations in methanol conversion over H-ZSM-5 zeolite[J]. Chem A Eur J, 2015, 21 (34): 12061- 12068. doi: 10.1002/chem.201501355
23	ROJO-GAMA D , SIGNORILE M , BONINO F , et al. Structure-deactivation relationships in zeolites during the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction: Complementary assessments of the coke content[J]. J Catal, 2017, 35133-48.
24	MORES D , STAVITSKI E , KOX M H F , et al. Space- and time-resolved in-situ spectroscopy on the coke formation in molecular sieves: methanol-to-olefin conversion over H-ZSM-5 and H-SAPO-34[J]. Chem A Eur J, 2008, 14 (36): 11320- 11327. doi: 10.1002/chem.200801293
25	GAO S S , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Insight into the deactivation mode of methanol-to-olefins conversion over SAPO-34:Coke, diffusion, and acidic site accessibility[J]. J Catal, 2018, 367, 306- 314. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.09.010
26	WU X Q , CHEN W , XU S T , et al. Dynamic activation of C1 molecules evoked by zeolite catalysis[J]. ACS Cent Sci, 2021, 7 (4): 681- 687. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00005
27	WANG S , CHEN Y Y , QIN Z F , et al. Origin and evolution of the initial hydrocarbon pool intermediates in the transition period for the conversion of methanol to olefins over H-ZSM-5 zeolite[J]. J Catal, 2019, 369, 382- 395. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.018
28	WU X Q , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Evolution of C-C bond formation in the methanol-to-olefins process: From direct coupling to autocatalysis[J]. ACS Catal, 2018, 8 (8): 7356- 7361. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02385
29	CHOWDHURY A D , HOUBEN K , WHITING G T , et al. Initial carbon-carbon bond formation during the early stages of the methanol-to-olefin process proven by zeolite-trapped acetate and methyl acetate[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2016, 55 (51): 15840- 15845. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608643
30	LIU Y , MÜLLER S , BERGER D , et al. Formation mechanism of the first carbon-carbon bond and the first olefin in the methanol conversion into hydrocarbons[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2016, 55 (19): 5723- 5726. doi: 10.1002/anie.201511678
31	WANG W , BUCHHOLZ A , SEILER M , et al. Evidence for an initiation of the methanol-to-olefin process by reactive surface methoxy groups on acidic zeolite catalysts[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2003, 125 (49): 15260- 15267. doi: 10.1021/ja0304244
32	WANG W , HUNGER M . Reactivity of surface alkoxy species on acidic zeolite catalysts[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2008, 41 (8): 895- 904. doi: 10.1021/ar700210f
33	JIANG Y J , HUNGER M , WANG W . On the reactivity of surface methoxy species in acidic zeolites[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128 (35): 11679- 11692. doi: 10.1021/ja061018y
34	JIANG Y J , WANG W , REDDY MARTHALA V R , et al. Effect of organic impurities on the hydrocarbon formation via the decomposition of surface methoxy groups on acidic zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 2006, 238 (1): 21- 27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.11.029
35	LI J F , WEI Z H , CHEN Y Y , et al. A route to form initial hydrocarbon pool species in methanol conversion to olefins over zeolites[J]. J Catal, 2014, 317, 277- 283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.05.015
36	WANG C , CHU Y Y , XU J , et al. Extra-framework aluminum-assisted initial C-C bond formation in methanol-to-olefins conversion on zeolite H-ZSM-5[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57 (32): 10197- 10201. doi: 10.1002/anie.201805609
37	YANG L , YAN T T , WANG C M , et al. Role of acetaldehyde in the roadmap from initial carbon-carbon bonds to hydrocarbons during methanol conversion[J]. ACS Catal, 2019, 9 (7): 6491- 6501. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00641
38	WU X Q , XU S T , ZHANG W N , et al. Direct mechanism of the first carbon-carbon bond formation in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56 (31): 9039- 9043. doi: 10.1002/anie.201703902
39	SUN T T , CHEN W , XU S T , et al. The first carbon-carbon bond formation mechanism in methanol-to-hydrocarbons process over chabazite zeolite[J]. Chem, 2021, 7 (9): 2415- 2428. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.05.023
40	YARULINA I , CHOWDHURY A D , MEIRER F , et al. Recent trends and fundamental insights in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process[J]. Nat Catal, 2018, 1 (6): 398- 411. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0078-5
41	HAW J F , SONG W G , MARCUS D M , et al. The mechanism of methanol to hydrocarbon catalysis[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2003, 36 (5): 317- 326. doi: 10.1021/ar020006o
42	ILIAS S , BHAN A . Mechanism of the catalytic conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons[J]. ACS Catal, 2013, 3 (1): 18- 31. doi: 10.1021/cs3006583
43	BJØRGEN M , SVELLE S , JOENSEN F , et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolite H-ZSM-5:On the origin of the olefinic species[J]. J Catal, 2007, 249 (2): 195- 207. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.04.006
44	ARSTAD B , NICHOLAS J B , HAW J F . Theoretical study of the methylbenzene side-chain hydrocarbon pool mechanism in methanol to olefin catalysis[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2004, 126 (9): 2991- 3001. doi: 10.1021/ja035923j
45	SONG W G , HAW J F , NICHOLAS J B , et al. Methylbenzenes are the organic reaction centers for methanol-to-olefin catalysis on HSAPO-34[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2000, 122 (43): 10726- 10727. doi: 10.1021/ja002195g
46	MCCANN D M , LESTHAEGHE D , KLETNIEKS P W , et al. A complete catalytic cycle for supramolecular methanol-to-olefins conversion by linking theory with experiment[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2008, 47 (28): 5179- 5182. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705453
47	ZHANG W N , ZHANG M Z , XU S T , et al. Methylcyclopentenyl cations linking initial stage and highly efficient stage in methanol-to-hydrocarbon process[J]. ACS Catal, 2020, 10 (8): 4510- 4516. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00799
48	XIAO D , XU S T , BROWNBILL N J , et al. Fast detection and structural identification of carbocations on zeolites by dynamic nuclear polarization enhanced solid-state NMR[J]. Chem Sci, 2018, 9 (43): 8184- 8193. doi: 10.1039/C8SC03848A
49	ZHANG M Z , XU S T , LI J Z , et al. Methanol to hydrocarbons reaction over Hβ zeolites studied by high resolution solid-state NMR spectroscopy: Carbenium ions formation and reaction mechanism[J]. J Catal, 2016, 335, 47- 57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.12.007
50	OLSBYE U , SVELLE S , LILLERUD K P , et al. The formation and degradation of active species during methanol conversion over protonated zeotype catalysts[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44 (20): 7155- 7176. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00304K
51	SONG W , MARCUS D M , FU H , et al. An oft-studied reaction that may never have been: Direct catalytic conversion of methanol or dimethyl ether to hydrocarbons on the solid acids HZSM-5 or HSAPO-34[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124 (15): 3844- 3845. doi: 10.1021/ja016499u
52	MINOVA I B , MATAM S K , GREENAWAY A , et al. Elementary steps in the formation of hydrocarbons from surface methoxy groups in HZSM-5 seen by synchrotron infrared microspectroscopy[J]. ACS Catal, 2019, 9 (7): 6564- 6570. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01820
53	HUNGER M . In situ NMR spectroscopy in heterogeneous catalysis[J]. Catal Today, 2004, 97 (1): 3- 12. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.03.061
54	HAW J F , GOGUEN P W , XU T , et al. In situ NMR investigations of heterogeneous catalysis with samples prepared under standard reaction conditions[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 1998, 37 (7): 948- 949. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980420)37:7<948::AID-ANIE948>3.0.CO;2-L
55	LI J Z , WEI Y X , CHEN J , et al. Observation of heptamethylbenzenium cation over SAPO-type molecular sieve DNL-6 under real MTO conversion conditions[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134 (2): 836- 839. doi: 10.1021/ja209950x
56	WANG J B , WEI Y X , LI J Z , et al. Direct observation of methylcyclopentenyl cations (MCP⁺) and olefin generation in methanol conversion over TON zeolite[J]. Catal Sci Technol, 2016, 6 (1): 89- 97. doi: 10.1039/C5CY01420D
57	CHEN J R , LI J Z , YUAN C Y , et al. Elucidating the olefin formation mechanism in the methanol to olefin reaction over AlPO-18 and SAPO-18[J]. Catal Sci Technol, 2014, 4 (9): 3268- 3277. doi: 10.1039/C4CY00551A
58	LI J Z , WEI Y X , CHEN J R , et al. Cavity controls the selectivity: Insights of confinement effects on MTO reaction[J]. ACS Catal, 2015, 5 (2): 661- 665. doi: 10.1021/cs501669k
59	ZHANG M , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Methanol conversion on ZSM-22, ZSM-35 and ZSM-5 zeolites: effects of 10-membered ring zeolite structures on methylcyclopentenyl cations and dual cycle mechanism[J]. RSC Adv, 2016, 6 (98): 95855- 95864. doi: 10.1039/C6RA08884H
60	ZHANG W N , CHEN J R , XU S T , et al. Methanol to olefins reaction over cavity-type zeolite: Cavity controls the critical intermediates and product selectivity[J]. ACS Catal, 2018, 8 (12): 10950- 10963. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02164
61	ZHANG W N , XU S T , ZHI Y C , et al. Methylcyclopentenyl cation mediated reaction route in methanol-to-olefins reaction over H-RUB-50 with small cavity[J]. J Energy Chem, 2020, 4525- 30.
62	XIAO D , XU S T , HAN X W , et al. Direct structural identification of carbenium ions and investigation of host-guest interaction in the methanol to olefins reaction obtained by multinuclear NMR correlations[J]. Chem Sci, 2017, 8 (12): 8309- 8314. doi: 10.1039/C7SC03657D
63	NI Q Z , DAVISO E , CAN T V , et al. High frequency dynamic nuclear polarization[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 46 (9): 1933- 1941. doi: 10.1021/ar300348n
64	LESAGE A , LELLI M , GAJAN D , et al. Surface enhanced NMR spectroscopy by dynamic nuclear polarization[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132 (44): 15459- 15461. doi: 10.1021/ja104771z
65	XIAO J R , WEI J . Diffusion mechanism of hydrocarbons in zeolites-Ⅱ. Analysis of experimental observations[J]. Chem Eng Sci, 1992, 47 (5): 1143- 1159. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(92)80237-7
66	SMIT B , MAESEN T L M . Towards a molecular understanding of shape selectivity[J]. Nature, 2008, 451 (7179): 671- 678. doi: 10.1038/nature06552
67	ZHOU J , FAN W , WANG Y D , et al. The essential mass transfer step in hierarchical/nano zeolite: surface diffusion[J]. Natl Sci Rev, 2019, 7 (11): 1630- 1632.
68	GAO S S , LIU Z Q , XU S T , et al. Cavity-controlled diffusion in 8-membered ring molecular sieve catalysts for shape selective strategy[J]. J Catal, 2019, 37751-62.
69	ZENG S , XU S T , GAO S S , et al. Differentiating diffusivity in different channels of ZSM-5 zeolite by pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR[J]. ChemCatChem, 2020, 12 (2): 463- 468. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201901689
70	HAN J F , LIU Z Q , LI H , et al. Simultaneous evaluation of reaction and diffusion over molecular sieves for shape-selective catalysis[J]. ACS Catal, 2020, 10 (15): 8727- 8735. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c02054
71	PENG S C , GAO M B , LI H , et al. Control of surface barriers in mass transfer to modulate methanol-to-olefins reaction over SAPO-34 zeolites[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59 (49): 21945- 21948. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009230
72	DAI W L , SCHEIBE M , LI L D , et al. Effect of the methanol-to-olefin conversion on the PFG NMR self-diffusivities of ethane and ethene in large-crystalline SAPO-34[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116 (3): 2469- 2476. doi: 10.1021/jp208815g
73	CNUDDE P , REDEKOP E A , DAI W , et al. Experimental and theoretical evidence for the promotional effect of acid sites on the diffusion of alkenes through small-pore zeolites[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60 (18): 10016- 10022. doi: 10.1002/anie.202017025
74	KÄRGER J . Transport Phenomena in Nanoporous Materials[J]. ChemPhysChem, 2015, 16 (1): 24- 51. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201402340
75	KÄRGER J , VALIULLIN R . Mass transfer in mesoporous materials: the benefit of microscopic diffusion measurement[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2013, 42 (9): 4172- 4197. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35326e
76	SMIT B , MAESEN T L M . Molecular simulations of zeolites: Adsorption, diffusion, and shape selectivity[J]. Chem Rev, 2008, 108 (10): 4125- 4184. doi: 10.1021/cr8002642
77	BUURMANS I L C , WECKHUYSEN B M . Heterogeneities of individual catalyst particles in space and time as monitored by spectroscopy[J]. Nat Chem, 2012, 4 (11): 873- 886. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1478
78	LOSCH P , PINAR A B , WILLINGER M G , et al. H-ZSM-5 zeolite model crystals: Structure-diffusion-activity relationship in methanol-to-olefins catalysis[J]. J Catal, 2017, 34511-23.
79	SHEN Y F , LE T T , FU D L , et al. Deconvoluting the competing effects of zeolite framework topology and diffusion path length on methanol to hydrocarbons reaction[J]. ACS Catal, 2018, 8 (12): 11042- 11053. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02274
80	SPRINGUEL-HUET M A , BONARDET J L , GéDéON A , et al. ¹²⁹Xe NMR overview of xenon physisorbed in porous solids[J]. Magn Reson Chem, 1999, 37 (13): S1- S13. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-458X(199912)37:13<S1::AID-MRC578>3.0.CO;2-X
81	WEILAND E , SPRINGUEL-HUET M A , NOSSOV A , et al. ¹²⁹Xenon NMR: Review of recent insights into porous materials[J]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2016, 225 (1): 41- 65.
82	GAO S S , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Direct probing of heterogeneity for adsorption and diffusion within a SAPO-34 crystal[J]. Chem Commun, 2019, 55 (72): 10693- 10696. doi: 10.1039/C9CC05322K
83	GAO S S , YUAN J M , LIU Z Q , et al. Correlating the adsorption preference and mass transfer of xenon in RHO-type molecular sieves[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2021, 125 (12): 6832- 6838. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10813
84	LOU C Y , ZHANG W N , MA C , et al. Revealing the specific spatial confinement in 8-membered ring cage-type molecular sieves via solid-state NMR and theoretical calculations[J]. ChemCatChem, 2021, 13 (5): 1299- 1305. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202001682
85	ANDERSON M W , KLINOWSKI J . Direct observation of shape selectivity in zeolite ZSM-5 by magic-angle-spinning NMR[J]. Nature, 1989, 339 (6221): 200- 203. doi: 10.1038/339200a0
86	WEI Y X , YUAN C Y , LI J Z , et al. Coke formation and carbon atom economy of methanol-to-olefins reaction[J]. ChemSusChem, 2012, 5 (5): 906- 912. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201100528

[1]	肖瑶,夏长久,易先锋,刘凤庆,刘尚斌,郑安民. 固体核磁共振技术在锡硅分子筛表征中的应用[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2021, 38(4): 571-584.
[2]	袁晨露, 郭茜旎, 陈世桢, 周欣. 新型葫芦[6]脲纳米颗粒超极化¹²⁹Xe“分子笼”研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2019, 36(4): 472-480.
[3]	李红卫, 袁志良, 夏斌. 扩散序谱(DOSY)实验测定缓冲体系中蛋白质表观分子量[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2018, 35(3): 280-286.
[4]	李博解，徐君，王强，王秀梅，齐国栋，邓风. 铜丝光沸石上甲醇羰基化反应的固体核磁共振研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2014, 31(3): 331-340.
[5]	刘奕, 谭相石. 乙酰辅酶A合成酶/一氧化碳脱氢酶的EPR研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2011, 28(4): 490-501.
[6]	李芳1,3 ；赵应声2 ；雷爱文2 ；刘买利1 . 钯催化C_sp-C_sp3偶联反应的¹³C NMR定量研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2008, 25(4): 461-469.
[7]	杨盈1,2 ; 严宝珍1 ; 聂舟2 ; 王梅1 ; 田秋2 ; 刘扬2 . α-生育酚与自由基DPPH^·的反应机理研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2008, 25(3): 331-336.
[8]	作者：牛亚明导师：姜振华. 含萘环聚芳醚酮类聚合物的分子设计与性质研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2006, 23(4): 552-556.
[9]	谢海滨, 李鲠颖, 杨光. 自制微成像系统的Spiral快速成像实现[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2004, 21(4): 467-474.
[10]	崔艳芳1,2，文健3，刘买利1*. 应用脉冲梯度场NMR研究脂蛋白的自扩散系数分布[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2003, 20(1): 8-15.
[11]	郑绍宽, 廖新丽, 林国兴, 林东海, 吴钦义. 结合脉冲梯度场的选择激发技术在溶剂峰抑制中的应用[J]. 波谱学杂志, 1999, 16(4): 368-372.
[12]	林国兴, 廖新丽, 林东海, 郑绍宽, 陈忠, 吴钦义. 脉冲梯度场增强的DQF-COSY实验t₁噪声研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 1999, 16(1): 13-20.
[13]	郑绍宽, 林东海, 廖新丽, 林国兴, 吴钦义. 结合脉冲梯度场(PFG)的选择性形状脉冲的相位特性研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 1998, 15(6): 527-531.
[14]	吴先球, 边明华, 李向红, 李晓勇, 邬学文. 脉冲梯度增强技术的初步研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 1996, 13(2): 169-175.
[15]	陈忠, 卢葛覃, 吴钦义. 超快速COSY类2D NMR实验弛豫假峰的抑制[J]. 波谱学杂志, 1995, 12(3): 331-337.