渤海J油田储层核磁共振测井孔隙度影响因素分析及校正

doi:10.11938/cjmr20192770

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤海J油田沙河街组储层核磁共振（NMR）测井孔隙度和岩心NMR孔隙度均低于岩心氦孔隙度，这种现象影响了NMR测井的应用效果．通过开展岩心NMR实验，对该研究区仪器采集参数、井眼环境以及储层流体性质等因素进行分析，发现造成储层NMR测井孔隙度偏低的主要原因是高矿化度泥浆滤液侵入．基于饱和不同矿化度盐水对T₂谱的影响规律，确定了需要对T₂谱进行形态校正的矿化度下限值，并建立了对应不同矿化度的T₂谱形态校正模型及NMR孔隙度校正方法．应用结果表明，校正后的NMR测井孔隙度与岩心氦孔隙度的平均相对误差从13.56%下降至2.81%，有效提高了NMR测井孔隙度的精度．

关键词: 核磁共振（NMR）测井, 孔隙度, 影响因素, T₂谱, 校正模型

Abstract: The porosity of reservoir bed and core in the Shahejie formation of the J oilfield of Bohai bay measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging were found to be lower than those measured by the reference helium method, affecting the application of NMR logging. NMR experiments on the core samples were performed to study the contributions of potential affecting factors, including instrument acquisition parameters, wellbore environment and reservoir fluid properties. The main reason for the lower porosity measured by NMR logging was found to be the intrusion of high salinity mud filtrate. The effects of brines with different salinity on NMR T₂ spectrum were analyzed, and the results were used to determine the lower limit of salinity required for morphological correction of the NMR T₂ spectrum. In view of that the intrusion of high salinity mud filtrate could affect the NMR T₂ spectrum during actual logging, a model for morphological correction of the NMR T₂ spectrum and a method to correct the NMR porosity at different salinity were established. The experimental results demonstrated that the average relative error of the NMR porosity reduced from 13.56% to 2.81% after correction.

Key words: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging, porosity, influencing factors, T₂ spectrum, correction model

中图分类号:

P631

刘欢, 徐锦绣, 郑炀, 熊镭. 渤海J油田储层核磁共振测井孔隙度影响因素分析及校正[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37(3): 370-380.

LIU Huan, XU Jin-xiu, ZHENG Yang, XIONG Lei. Factors Affecting and Correction Methods for Porosity Measured by NMR Logging in the J Oilfield of Bohai Bay[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2020, 37(3): 370-380.

参考文献

[1] COATES G, MENGER S, PRAMMER M, et al. Applying NMR total and effective porosity to formation evaluation[C]. SPE Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1997.
[2] 王筱文, 肖立志, 谢然红, 等. 中国陆相地层核磁共振孔隙度研究[J]. 中国科学:物理学、力学、天文学, 2006, 36(4):366-374.
[3] XIAO L Z. Some important issues for NMR logging applications in China[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2007, 31(5):401-407.肖立志. 我国核磁共振测井应用中的若干重要问题[J]. 测井技术, 2007, 31(5):401-407.
[4] 谢然红, 肖立志, 王忠东, 等. 复杂流体储层核磁共振测井孔隙度影响因素[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2008(s1):194-199.
[5] LIAO G Z, XIAO L Z, XIE R H, et al. Influence of internal magnetic field gradient on nuclear magnetic resonance of volcanic rocks and its detection method[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2009, 33(5):56-60. 廖广志, 肖立志, 谢然红, 等. 内部磁场梯度对火山岩核磁共振特性的影响及其探测方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 33(5):56-60.
[6] WANG W M, YE C H, GUO H K. Experimental studies of NMR properties of continental sedimentary rocks[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2001, 18(2):113-121. 王为民, 叶朝辉, 郭和坤. 陆相储层岩石核磁共振物理特征的实验研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2001, 18(2):113-121.
[7] XIE R H, XIAO L Z, DUNN K J. NMR logging porosity activation and data processing method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2006, 49(5):1567-1572. 谢然红, 肖立志, 邓克俊. 核磁共振测井孔隙度观测模式与处理方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2006, 49(5):1567-1572.
[8] ZHANG G, HE Z B, CAO W Q, et al. Effect of the echo time on NMR apparent porosity and the correction method[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2020, 37(2):172-181. 张宫, 何宗斌, 曹文倩, 等. 回波间隔对核磁共振表观孔隙度的影响及矫正方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37(2):172-181.
[9] SHAO W Z, DING Y J, WANG Q M, et al. A quantitative evaluation method for heavy-oil reservoir with NMR log data[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2006, 30(1):67-71.邵维志, 丁娱娇, 王庆梅, 等. 用核磁共振测井定量评价稠油储层的方法[J]. 测井技术, 2006, 30(1):67-71.
[10] MINH C C, GUBELIN G, RAMAMOORYHY R, et al. Sonic-magnetic resonance method:A sourceless porosity evaluation in gas-bearing reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2001, 4(3):209-220.
[11] MAO Z Q, ZHANG C, XIAO L. A NMR-based porosity calculation method for low porosity and low permeability gas reservoir[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 45(1):105-109.毛志强, 张冲, 肖亮. 一种基于核磁共振测井计算低孔低渗气层孔隙度的新方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2010, 45(1):105-109.
[12] ZHOU Y, WEI G Q, GUO H K. Improvement of nuclear magnet resource reservoir porosity measuring accuracy by artificial intelligent algorithm[J]. Journal of Xian Shiyou University, 2011, 26(5):40-43. 周宇, 魏国齐, 郭和坤. 应用人工智能优化降低核磁共振孔隙度测量误差[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 26(5):40-43.
[13] WU F, SIMA L Q, LING H S. Analysis and correction of low reservoir porosity derived from NMR log in the Kunbei area[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2014, 21(2):75-79.吴丰, 司马立强, 令狐松, 等. 昆北地区储层核磁共振孔隙度偏低分析及校正[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014, 21(2):75-79.
[14] ZHENG Y, XU J X, LIU H, et al. A permeability evaluation method based on NMR logging while drilling and its application:Taking paleogene Shahejie formation in Jinzhou oilfield of Bohai sea as an example[J]. Chia Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(2):69-75. 郑炀, 徐锦绣, 刘欢, 等. 基于随钻核磁测井的渗透率评价方法及其应用-以渤海锦州油田古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(2):69-75.
[15] WANG Z D, WANG H, LI N G, et al. Analysis of core NMR data from laboratory measurements[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2001, 25(3):170-170.王忠东, 汪浩, 李能根, 等. 核磁共振岩心基础实验分析[J]. 测井技术, 2001, 25(3):170-170.
[16] WANG Z Z, DENG M Y, ZHAI S D, et al. Factors affecting NMR T₂ spectra of oil well samples and methods for determining the T₂ cutoff value[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2006, 23(1):143-151.王志战, 邓美寅, 翟慎德, 等. 油井样品NMR T₂谱的影响因素及T₂截止值的确定方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2006, 23(1):143-151.
[17] GONG G B, SUN B Q, LIU M L, et al. NMR relaxation of the fluid in rock porous media[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2006, 23(3):379-395.龚国波, 孙伯勤, 刘买利, 等. 岩心孔隙介质中流体的核磁共振弛豫[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2006, 23(3):379-395.
[18] XIE R H, XIAO L Z, LIU T D. NMR relaxation properties of crude oils[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2007, 29(5):21-24.谢然红, 肖立志, 刘天定. 原油的核磁共振弛豫特性[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(5):21-24.
[19] 廖广志, 肖立志. 孔隙尺度侵入模型的核磁共振测井响应特征研究[C]. 全国波谱学学术会议, 2010.
[20] 匡立春, 孙中春, 毛志强, 等. 核磁共振测井技术在准噶尔盆地油气勘探开发中的应用[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2015.
[21] STRALEY C, ROSSINI D, VINEGR H, et al. Core analysis by low field NMR[R]. The Society of Core Analysts, SCA-9404, 1994.
[22] MAO Z Q, XIAO L, WANG Z N, et al. Estimation of permeability by integrating nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs with mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data in tight gas sands[J]. Applied Magnetic Resonance, 2013, 44(4):449-468.
[23] XIAO L, MAO Z Q, LI J, et al. Effect of hydrocarbon on evaluating formation pore structure using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging[J]. Fuel, 2018, 216:199-207.
[24] KENYON W E. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging[J]. The Log Analysis, 1997, 38(3):21-43.