基于低场核磁共振的抚顺油页岩孔隙连通性演化研究

doi:10.11938/cjmr20182687

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 油页岩原位注热开采过程中，储层内部孔隙结构的连通性直接影响载热介质的流动行为和传热效率，同时对油气产物的扩散和流动行为起控制作用.本文利用低场核磁共振（LF NMR）技术，考察了不同热解终温（23~650℃）处理时，饱和水及束缚水状态下抚顺油页岩的T₂谱，分析了可动流体T₂截止值、束缚流体孔隙度、饱和流体孔隙度、渗透率等NMR孔隙参数，定量研究了随热解终温升高，抚顺油页岩孔隙结构的连通性演化规律.研究结果表明热解终温对抚顺油页岩孔隙连通性及渗透率的变化起控制作用，且可动流体孔隙度对总孔隙度的增加起主要促进作用，这说明热解终温升高加大了渗透率及油气产物的输运能力.本文为深入认识油页岩原位热解过程中孔隙结构的演化提供了依据.

关键词: 油页岩, 原位热解, 低场核磁共振, 孔隙度, 连通性

Abstract: During in-situ exploitation of the oil shale, the connectivity of the pore structure of the reservoir directly affects not only the flow behavior and heat transfer efficiency of the heat-carrying medium, but also the diffusion and flow behaviors of the oil and gas. In this study, the T₂ spectra of saturated water and bound water in samples from the Fushun oil shale were measured with low-field nuclear magnetic resonance at different final pyrolysis temperatures (23~650℃). NMR pore parameters, including T₂ cutoff value of movable fluid, bound fluid porosity, saturated fluid porosity and permeability, were analyzed. The evolution of pore connectivity of the oil shale with final pyrolysis temperature was studied quantitatively. The results demonstrated that final pyrolysis temperature affected the variations of pore connectivity and the permeability of oil shale. The increase of total porosity could be attributed mainly to the increments of movable fluid. These results indicated that increases in final pyrolysis temperature enhanced the permeability and transport of oil and gas, providing a basis for further understanding of the evolution of pore structure in oil shale in-situ pyrolysis.

Key words: oil shale, in-situ pyrolysis, low-field nuclear magnetic resonance, porosity, connectivity

中图分类号:

O482.53
TD84

刘志军, 杨栋, 邵继喜, 胡耀青. 基于低场核磁共振的抚顺油页岩孔隙连通性演化研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2019, 36(3): 309-318.

LIU Zhi-jun, YANG Dong, SHAO Ji-xi, HU Yao-qing. Evolution of Pore Connectivity in the Fushun Oil Shale by Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2019, 36(3): 309-318.

参考文献

[1] LIU D X, WANG H Y, ZHENG D W, et al. World progress of oil shale in-situ exploitation methods[J]. Nat Gas Ind, 2009, 29(5):128-132. 刘德勋, 王红岩, 郑德温, 等. 世界油页岩原位开采技术进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(5):128-132.
[2] KANG Z Q, YANG D, ZHAO Y S, et al. Thermal cracking and corresponding permeability of Fushun oil shale[J]. Oil Shale, 2011, 28(2):273-283.
[3] LIU Z J, YANG D, HU Y Q, et al. Influence of in situ pyrolysis on the evolution of pore structure of oil shale[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(4):755.
[4] DONG F K, YANG D, FENG Z J. Permeability evolution of jimsar oil shale under high temperature and triaxial stresses[J]. Coal Technology, 2017, 36(8):165-166. 董付科, 杨栋, 冯子军. 高温三轴应力下吉木萨尔油页岩渗透率演化规律[J]. 煤炭技术, 2017, 36(8):165-166.
[5] YANG D, XUE J X, KANG Z Q, et al. Dry distillation and seepage experiments of Fushun oil shale[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Edition), 2007, 22(2):23-25. 杨栋, 薛晋霞, 康志勤, 等. 抚顺油页岩干馏渗透实验研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 22(2):23-25.
[6] LIU Z H, YANG D, XUE J X, et al. Experimental study on seepage law of distilied oil shale[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2006, 37(4):414-416. 刘中华, 杨栋, 薛晋霞, 等. 干馏后油页岩渗透规律的实验研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2006, 37(4):414-416.
[7] KANG Z Q, WANG W, CAO W, et al. Experimental study of permeating law of oil shale under in-situ process[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2013, 44(6):768-770. 康志勤, 王玮, 曹伟, 等. 原位开采背景下油页岩渗透规律的研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2013, 44(6):768-770.
[8] LI J, TANG D Z, XUE H Q, et al. Discission of oil shale in-situ conversion process in china[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2014, 36(1):58-64. 李隽, 汤达祯, 薛华庆, 等. 中国油页岩原位开采可行性初探[J]. 西南石油大学学报, 2014, (1):58-64.
[9] GENG Y D, LIANG W G, LIU J, et al. Evolution of pore and fracture structure of oil shale under high temperature and high pressure[J]. Energ Fuel, 2017, 31(10):10404-10413.
[10] YANG L S, YANG D, ZHAO J, et al. Changes of oil shale pore structure and permeability at different temperatures[J]. Oil Shale, 2016, 33(2):101-110.
[11] KANG Z Q, WANG W, ZHAO Y S, et al. Three-dimensional percolation mechanism in oil shale under different temperatures based on micro-CT[J]. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2014, 33(9):1837-1842. 康志勤, 王玮, 赵阳升, 等. 基于显微CT技术的不同温度下油页岩孔隙结构三维逾渗规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(9):1837-1842.
[12] KANG Z Q, ZHAO J, YANG D, et al. Study of the evolution of micron-scale pore structure in oil shale at different temperatures[J]. Oil Shale, 2017, 34(1):42.
[13] LIU T Y, XIAO L Z, FU R S, et al. Applications and characterization of NMR relaxation derived from sphere-capillary model[J]. Chin J Geophys, 2004, 47(4):663-671. 刘堂晏, 肖立志, 傅容珊, 等. 球管孔隙模型的核磁共振(NMR)弛豫特征及应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2004, 47(4):663-671.
[14] ZHOU Y, WEI G Q, GUO H S. Impact factors analysis and decision tree correction of NMR porosity measurements[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2011,35(3):210-214. 周宇, 魏国齐, 郭和坤. 核磁共振孔隙度影响因素分析与校准[J]. 测井技术, 2011, 35(3):210-214.
[15] DENG F, XIAO L Z, TAO Y, et al. Low-field and on-line NMR detection for fluid molecular structure[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2017, 34(2):214-222. 邓峰, 肖立志, 陶冶, 等. 低场核磁共振流体分子结构在线探测技术[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2017, 34(02):214-222.
[16] HE Y D, MAO Z Q, XIAO L Z, et al. An improved method of using NMR T₂ distribution to evaluate pore size distribution[J]. Chin J Geophys, 2005, 48(2):373-378. 何雨丹, 毛志强, 肖立志, 等. 核磁共振T₂分布评价岩石孔径分布的改进方法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2005, 48(2):373-378.
[17] SI-MA L Q, ZHAO H, DAI S H. Analysis of adaptability of application of NMR logging in igneous rock reservoirs[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(1):145-152. 司马立强, 赵辉, 戴诗华. 核磁共振测井在火成岩地层应用的适应性分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(1):145-152.
[18] ZHAO P Q, SUN Z C, LUO X P, et al. Study on the response mechanisms of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) log in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Chin J Geophys, 2016, 59(5):1927-1937. 赵培强, 孙中春, 罗兴平, 等. 致密油储层核磁共振测井响应机理研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59(5):1927-1937.
[19] TANG J P, PAN Y S, ZHANG Z G. NMRI research on storage and transport of coalbed methane[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2005, 24(5):674-676. 唐巨鹏, 潘一山, 张佐刚. 煤层气赋存和运移规律的NMRI研究[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报, 2005, 24(5):674-676.
[20] YANG Z M, XIAN B A, JIANG H Q, et al. The experimental study on coalbed gas reservoir using nuclear magnetic resonance technique[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 2009, 6(4):20-23. 杨正明, 鲜保安, 姜汉桥, 等. 煤层气藏核磁共振技术实验研究[J]. 中国煤层气, 2009, 6(4):20-23.
[21] CAI Y D, LIU D M, PAN Z J, et al. Petrophysical characterization of chinese coal cores with heat treatment by nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Fuel, 2013, 108(11):292-302.
[22] YAO Y B, LIU D M, TANG D Z, et al. Fractal characterization of adsorption-pores of coals from north China:An investigation on CH₄ adsorption capacity of coals[J]. Int J Coal Geol, 2008, 73(1):27-42.
[23] YAO Y B, LIU D M. Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals[J]. Fuel, 2012, 95(1):52-158.
[24] HINAI A A, REZAEE R, ESTEBAN L, et al. Comparisons of pore size distribution:A case from the western Australian gas shale formations[J]. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2014, 8:1-13.
[25] LI J J, YIN J X, ZHANG Y N, et al. A comparison of experimental methods for describing shale pore features-A case study in the Bohai Bay Basin of eastern China[J]. Int J Coal Geol, 2015, 152:39-49.
[26] SAIDIAN M, GODINEZ L J, RIVERA S, et al. Porosity and pore size distribution in mudrocks:A comparative study for Haynesville, Niobrara, Monterey, and Eastern European Silurian formations[C]//Colorado:Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014:1226-1243.
[27] LI G Y, MA Z L, ZHENG J C, et al. NMR analysis of the physical change of oil shales during in situ pyrolysis at different temperatures[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(3):402-406. 李广友, 马中良, 郑家锡, 等. 油页岩不同温度原位热解物性变化核磁共振分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(3):402-406.
[28] KAUSIK R, FELLAH K, RYLANDER E, et al. NMR Petrophysics for tight oil shale enabled by core resaturation[C]//International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. 2014:3.
[29] YAO Y B, LIU D M, CHE Y, et al. Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(7):1371-1380.
[30] LI S, TANG D, PAN Z, et al. Characterization of the stress sensitivity of pores for different rank coals by nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Fuel, 2013, 111(3):746-754.
[31] HAO J Q, GU Z J, ZHOU J G, et al. The relationship of rheology of magnetite rock with anisotropy of magnetic susceptibilility[J]. Chin J Geophys, 1999, 42(1):112-119. 郝锦绮, 顾芷娟, 周建国, 等. 磁铁矿岩的流变与磁化率各向异性[J]. 地球物理学报, 1999, 42(1):112-119.
[32] LIU Z C, CHENG Q, LIU N G, et al. NMR on-line measurement of stress sensitivity of tight matrix limestone cores in a karstic reservoir[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2017, 34(2):206-213. 刘中春, 程倩, 刘乃贵, 等. 缝洞型油藏致密基质灰岩的压力敏感性规律的NMR研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2017, 34(2):206-213.
[33] ZHOU S W, XUE H Q, GUO W, et al. Measuring movable oil saturation in reservoirs with low-field NMR technology[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2015, 32(3):489-498. 周尚文, 薛华庆, 郭伟, 等. 基于低场核磁共振技术的储层可动油饱和度测试新方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(03):489-498.
[34] OU-YANG Z Q, LIU D M, CAI Y D, et al. Investigating the fractal characteristics of pore-fractures in bituminous coals and anthracites through fluid flow behavior[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(12):10348-10357.
[35] KENYON W E. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging[J]. Log Analyst, 1997, 38(2):21-40.
[36] RAMIA M E, MARTIN C A. Sedimentary rock porosity studied by electromagnetic techniques:nuclear magnetic resonance and dielectric permittivity[J]. Appl Phys A-Mater, 2015, 118(2):769-777.
[37] LIU Z J, YANG D, HU Y Q, et al. Low temperature nitrogen adsorption analysis of pore structure evolution in in-situ pyrolysis of oil shale[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2018, 38(5):737-742. 刘志军, 杨栋, 胡耀青, 等. 油页岩原位热解孔隙结构演化的低温氮吸附分析[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2018, 38(5):737-742.
[38] 姚艳斌, 刘大锰. 煤储层精细定量表征与综合评价模型[M]. 武汉:地质出版社, 2013.
[39] 赵静. 高温及三维应力下油页岩细观特征及力学特性试验研究[D]. 太原:太原理工大学, 2014.