Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 408-420.doi: 10.11938/cjmr20172571

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of Three NMR Methods for Measuring Crosslink Density of Rubbers

GAO Peng-fei1, CHU Lin-lin1, YANG Yi2, JIANG Ji-feng3, WANG Jia-chen1, YAO Ye-feng1, ZHOU Bing4   

  1. 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
    2. Shanghai Niumag Electronic Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200062, China;
    3. Double Coin Group Shanghai Tire Research Institute Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200237, China;
    4. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
  • Received:2017-04-05 Revised:2017-10-29 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-11-29

Abstract: NMR is a frequently used technique for measuring crosslink density of rubbers. In this work, three commonly used proton NMR methods for measuring crosslink density of rubbers[i.e., 1H double-quantum (DQ) NMR, 1H Hahn echo and 1H CPMG echo] were compared. Different approaches showed different results, and the origin of such discrepancy was discussed. The echo time dependence of the crosslink density measured with the CPMG echo method was studied. The ways to improve theCPMG echo-based measurements are discussed.

Key words: 1H CPMG echo, 1H Hahn echo, 1H double-quantum (DQ) NMR, natural rubber, crosslink density

CLC Number: