图5. 施加不同持续时间MT脉冲与未施加MT脉冲序列采集的图像重建得到的核团磁化率值定量比较.(a)、(c)、(e)和(g)为核团磁化率值线性回归图，图中的实线和虚线分别是线性回归的趋势线和等值线；(b)、(d)、(f)和(h)为Bland-Altman图，图中的实线和虚线分别是平均值和1.96倍标准差的平均差异.CN：尾状核；PUT：壳核；GP：苍白球；RN：红核；SN：黑质；DN：齿状核

Fig. 5. Quantitative comparison of the susceptibility values acquired with MT pulses of different durations and without MT pulse. (a), (c), (e), (g) scattered plots of the linear regression analysis of susceptibility values. The solid and dotted lines are the trend line of the linear regression and the line of equality, respectively. (b), (d), (f), (h) Bland-Altman plots. The solid and dotted lines indicate the mean difference and the mean difference ± 1.96 times the standard deviation of the difference, respectively. CN, caudate nucleus; PUT, putamen; GP, globus pallidus; RN, red nucleus; SN, substantia nigra; DN, dentate nucleus